Tda v Tcz and Others
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 12 April 2016 |
| Date | 12 April 2016 |
| Docket Number | HCF/District Court Appeal No 62 of 2015 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Novartis (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...for overturning a judge’s exercise of discretion is a “high one” even though appeals are by way of rehearing: see TDA v TCZ and others [2016] 3 SLR 329 at [25] cited by this Court in Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd [2017] SGCA 30 at [21]. The circumstances for overturning a ......
-
Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd
...so as to defeat the rights of the parties altogether and would be an injustice to one or other of the parties. In TDA v TCZ and others [2016] 3 SLR 329, Judith Prakash J (as she then was) observed (at [25]) on the strength of Tay Beng Chuan that the standard for overturning a judge’s exerci......
-
Twd v Uqe
...of the DJ’s discretion under r 178(2) of the FJR. My decision The standard of review I begin with the applicable standard of review. In TDA v TCZ and others [2016] 3 SLR 329 (“TDA”), which was also an appeal against the decision of a court hearing proceedings under the MCA (a “MCA court”) t......
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...SGHC 48. 2 [2016] 2 SLR 1. 3 Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed. 4 [2016] 4 SLR 351. 5 Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed. 6 [2016] 3 SLR 1264. 7 S 813/2014. 8 [2016] 3 SLR 329. 9 Cap 177A, 2010 Rev Ed. 10 [2016] 3 SLR 1195. 11 [2006] 2 SLR(R) 525. 12 [2016] 2 SLR 781. 13 Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems Pte Ltd [2......