Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd and Another
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 09 January 2002 |
| Date | 09 January 2002 |
| Docket Number | Suit No 146 of 2001 (Registrar's |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Orient Centre Investments Ltd v Société Générale
...Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] 2 Lloyd's Rep 511 (refd) Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd [2002] 1 SLR (R) 44; [2002] 4 SLR 953 (folld) Valse Holdings SA v Merrill Lynch International Bank Ltd [2004] EWHC 2471 (refd) Evidence Act (Cap 97,1997 Rev Ed)s......
-
Orient Centre Investments Ltd and Another v Societe Generale
...61 In our view, it was not too late for SG to make its striking out application on 1 March 2006: see Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd [2002] 4 SLR 953, at 62 In ground (6), the appellants contended that SG has not satisfied the threshold requirements of O 18 r 19 of the Rules of Court (Cap 32......
-
VBH Singapore Pte Ltd v Technobuilt Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd
...should be made as soon as possible, a late application is not doomed to failure (see Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd and another [2002] 1 SLR(R) 44 at [66], approved in Orient Centre Investments Ltd and another v Societe Generale [2007] 3 SLR(R) 566 (“Orient Centre”) at [61]). Although the W......
-
Werner Samuel Vuillemin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited
...lateness of the application was concerned, as noted by the Deputy Registrar, the High Court decision of Tapematic SpA v Wiarana Pte Ltd [2002] SGHC5 had held that a late application was not doomed to failure. The court there had also struck out the pleadings after the affidavits of evidence......
2 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...9.24, 9.28 and 9.91, with regard to “Implied terms”, “Exception clauses” and “Remedies” respectively); Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd[2002] 4 SLR 953 (also referred to infra, at para 9.46 with regard to “Misrepresentation”); and Trigen Industries Ltd v Sinko Technologies Pte Ltd[2003] 1 SLR......
-
Civil Procedure
...case against the respondent had no basis (at [62]—[64]). The Court of Appeal cited the principles in Tapematic SpA v Wirana Pte Ltd[2002] 4 SLR 953 concerning the time of application; Gabriel Peter & Partners v Wee Chong Jin[1998] 1 SLR 374 concerning the merits of the application; and Chok......