Tan Ng Kuang v Jai Swarup Pathak
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Andrew Phang Boon Leong JCA,Steven Chong JCA,Woo Bih Li JAD |
| Judgment Date | 14 October 2021 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | Originating Summons No 2 of 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1 firm's commentaries
-
Intention Necessary To Prove Charge Of Lawyer Being Party To Or Assisting Client In Suppressing Evidence, Court Of Three Judges Rules
...with recent decisions, where this duty had been pitted against other ethical rules. For example, in Tan Ng Kuang v Jai Swarup Pathak [2022] 3 SLR 788, the Court of Appeal held that the duty of confidentiality owed by a legal practitioner to his client was a fundamental and critical obligati......
1 books & journal articles
-
Legal Profession
...considers to be more run-of-the-mill. 2 See paras 22.2–22.49 below. 3 See paras 22.50–22.98 below. 4 [2021] SGDT 1. 5 [2021] SGDT 2. 6 [2022] 3 SLR 788. 7 Tan Ng Kuang v Jai Swarup Pathak [2022] 3 SLR 788 at [14]. 8 Tan Ng Kuang v Jai Swarup Pathak [2022] 3 SLR 788 at [18]. 9 Tan Ng Kuang v......