Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Date | 2013 |
| Year | 2013 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
CIMB Bank Bhd v Italmatic Tyre & Retreading Equipment (Asia) Pte Ltd
...who seeks an order for indemnity costs as a matter of discretion is…a high one” (Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 274 at [97]). Order 59 r 5 of the Rules of Court sets out a list of several factors which a court should take into account in considering whether i......
-
Razer (Asia-Pacific) Pte Ltd v Capgemini Singapore Pte Ltd
...is that costs are awarded on an indemnity basis only in exceptional circumstances: Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd[2013] SGHC 274. That said, the position differs when there is a contractual agreement on costs. In such situations, the question turns to whether the party s......
-
NSL Oilchem Waste Management Pte Ltd v Prosper Marine Pte Ltd and other suits
...is that costs are awarded on an indemnity basis only in exceptional circumstances: Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 274. That said, the position differs when there is a contractual agreement on costs. In such situations, the question turns to whether the party ......
-
Tan Kok Quan and others v Gao Shuchao
...behind the exercise of the court’s discretion to award indemnity costs are found in Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 274 (“Saxo”). Saxo referred to Macmillan Inc v Bishopsgate Investment Trust plc (10 December 1993, unreported) which alluded to cases brought wi......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...of the new three-step framework for the implication of terms in fact can be seen in Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd[2013] SGHC 274, where it was found that there is no gap which implication can remedy. Terms implied by law 12.34 In Cheah Peng Hock v Luzhou Bio-Chem Techno......
-
Civil Procedure
...[2017] SGHC 126. 181 [2017] 5 SLR 175. 182 See paras 8.108–8.110 above. 183 See para 8.111 above. 184 See paras 8.177–8.182 above. 185 [2013] SGHC 274. 186 10 December 1993, unreported. 187 Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd [2013] SGHC 274 at [98]. 188 Tan Chin Yew Joseph v......