Tan Chin Seng and Others v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeChao Hick Tin JA
Judgment Date16 July 2002
Neutral Citation[2002] SGCA 35
Citation[2002] SGCA 35
Date16 July 2002
Year2002
Plaintiff CounselTong Beng Teck Roland and Wang Shao-Ing ( Wong, Tan & Molly Lim )
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 51 of 2002
Defendant CounselK Shanmugam SC and Boey Swee Siang ( Allen & Gledhill )
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Published date19 September 2003
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • Sim Cheng Soon v BT Engineering Pte Ltd and Another
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • November 16, 2006
    ...satisfied, inter alia, the central criterion of relevance (laid down in numerous cases such as Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2002] 3 SLR 345). Conclusion 17 In our view, all three conditions set out in Ladd v Marshall have been satisfied. We therefore allow the application, and......
  • UMCI Ltd v Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • August 7, 2006
    ...for discovery in such circumstances. She relies upon the decision of the Court of Appeal in Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2002] 3 SLR 345 (“Raffles Town Club”) in this 70 In my judgment, no exception can be taken with the principles articulated in Raffles Town Club. The followi......
  • Sanae Achar v Sci-Gen Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • April 8, 2011
    ...must fulfil certain requirements. First, the document must be relevant (see Tan Chin Seng and others v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2002] 2 SLR(R) 465 (“Tan Chin Seng”) at [18]). In respect of discovery of specific documents, O 24 r 5(3) of the Rules of Court describes a relevant document to ......
  • Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Other Applications
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • July 28, 2004
    ...1 SLR 169 (folld) Ng Giok Oh v Sajjad Akhtar [2003] 1 SLR (R) 375; [2003] 1 SLR 375 (refd) Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2002] 2 SLR (R) 465; [2002] 3 SLR 345 (folld) Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed) s 5A Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2004 Rev Ed) O 24 rr 6 (3), 7 Supreme Cou......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • December 1, 2002
    ...consideration as well as mistake, see infra, paras 9.5, 9.16 and 9.61—9.66 respectively); Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd[2002] 3 SLR 345, reversing (in part) the High Court”s decision reported at [2002] 3 SLR 403 (and on related proceedings relating to “Misrepresentation”, see in......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • December 1, 2002
    ...the most significant case on discovery reported in 2002 was the Court of Appeal decision in Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd[2002] 3 SLR 345, where the Court of Appeal clarified a number of issues related to discovery. The court noted that O 24 r 1 had been amended and that documen......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • December 1, 2003
    ...on the facts of each case. Support for this was drawn from the Court of Appeal decision in Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd[2002] 3 SLR 345 where the Court of Appeal stated that the concept of a ‘train of inquiry’, while no longer relevant to general discovery, was still relevant t......
  • ACCESS TO JUSTICE: A CASE FOR CONTINGENCY FEES IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2004, December 2004
    • December 1, 2004
    ...Boulle & Nesic, supra, n 260 at p 65. 266 As pointed out by the Singapore Court of Appeal in Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd[2002] 3 SLR 345, whereas the former rules governing discovery prescribed open-ended criteria which gave rise to abuses and difficulties in application, the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT