Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff and Another v Arjan Bhisham Chotrani
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 01 February 1999 |
| Date | 01 February 1999 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 111 of 1998 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
31 cases
-
Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd v Lau Yu Man
...and contumeliously or contumaciously, although the Singapore Court of Appeal in Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff v Arjan Bhisham Chotrani [1999] 1 SLR 750 (“the Syed Mohamed case”) also pointed (at [13]) to an apparent requirement to the effect that “the failure to obey was due to extraneous ci......
-
Zhong Da Chemical Development Company Ltd v Lanco Industries Ltd
...3 SLR 538 (refd) Porzelack KG v Porzelack (UK) Ltd [1987] 1 WLR 420 (refd) Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff v Arjan Bhisham Chotrani [1999] 1 SLR (R) 361; [1999] 1 SLR 750 (folld) Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp [2004] 1 SLR (R) 1; [2004] 1 SLR 1 (refd) Arbitration Act (Cap 10,2002 Rev Ed)s......
-
Changhe International Investments Pte Ltd (formerly known as Druidstone Pte Ltd) v Dexia BIL Asia Singapore Ltd (formerly known as Banque Internationale A Luxembourg BIL (Asia) Ltd)
...followed in several decisions in Singapore and, in particular, by this court in Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff v Arjan Bhisham Chotrani [1999] 1 SLR 750 (“the Syed Mohamed case”) where this court held that in cases in which it had to decide what were to be the consequences of a failure to com......
-
Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P and another and another suit
...Soh Lup Chee v Seow Boon Cheng [2002] 1 SLR (R) 604; [2002] 2 SLR 267 (folld) Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff v Arjan Bhisham Chotrani [1999] 1 SLR (R) 361; [1999] 1 SLR 750 (refd) Tokai Maru, The [1998] 2 SLR (R) 646; [1998] 3 SLR 105 (refd) WBG Network (S) Pte Ltd v Sunny Daisy Ltd [2007] 1 ......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...Pte Ltd v CGU International Insurance plc[2001] 1 SLR 413, Lai Kew Chai J, citing Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff v Arjan Bhisham Chotrani [1999] 1 SLR 750, said (at 418) that the following rules applied in dealing with unless orders: “(1) when considering the consequences of a failure to comp......
-
Case Note
...Development Co Ltd v Lanco Industries Ltd [2009] 3 SLR(R) 1017 at [24]. See also Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff v Arjan Bhisham Chotrani[1999] 1 SLR(R) 361 at [15]. 6 Hytec Information Systems Ltd v Coventry City Council [1997] 1 WLR 1666. 7 [1989] 2 SLR(R) 603. 8 The court noted that though ......
-
Civil Procedure
...v Toh Eng Peng[2004] SGHC 269, at [26], the High Court (applying the principles in Syed Mohamed Abdul Muthaliff v Arjan Bisham Chotrani[1999] 1 SLR 750), did not enforce the consequences of an ‘unless order’ because the defendants had not acted contumaciously in the circumstances (although ......
-
UNLESS ORDERS FOLLOWING SYED MOHAMED ABDUL MUTHALIFF @ ABDUL HALIM S/O MOHD IBRAHIM AND JUNAITHA BEGUM W/O ABDUL HALIM V ARJAN BHISHAM CHOTRANI
...v Arjan Bhisham Chotrani, Civil Appeal No 111 of 1998, was heard on 23 November 1998 and judgment was delivered on 1 February 1999. 5 [1999] 1 SLR 750. 6 [1993] 1 All ER 630 at 636 to 637. 7 Hytec Information Systems Ltd v Coventry City Council [1997] 1 WLR 1666 at 1677. 8 [1997] 1 WLR 1666......