Sumitomo Bank Ltd v Kartika Ratna Thahir and Others and another matter
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 03 December 1992 |
| Date | 03 December 1992 |
| Docket Number | Originating Summons No 308 of 1976 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
30 cases
-
Rickshaw Investments Ltd and Another v Nicolai Baron Von Uexkull
...before me, between the alleged duties and breaches and the contract. 46 Mr Bull also relied on Sumitomo Bank Ltd v Kartika Ratna Thahir [1993] 1 SLR 735 (“Kartika”) where Lai Kew Chai J said from 789 to 790, Courts of equity will apply their own rules to determining whether there is an equi......
- Hong Kong (AG) v Reid
-
Yogambikai Nagarajah v Indian Overseas Bank
... ... The money, the subject matter in both suits, originally belonged to the estate ... [Emphasis added.] ... In another case in the High Court, Eastern Enterprises v ... In Sumitomo Bank Ltd v Kartika Ratna Thahir [1993] 1 SLR ... ...
-
Peng Ann Realty Pte Ltd v Liu Cho Chit
...5 acres would or could be left unacquried. The exception was therefore applicable: at [46]. Sumitomo Bank Ltd v Thahir Kartika Ratna [1992] 3 SLR (R) 638; [1993] 1 SLR 735 (folld) Companies Act (Cap 50, 1990 Rev Ed) ss 157 (1), 157 (3) Limitation Act (Cap 163, 1985 Rev Ed) s 22 (1) (consd);......
Get Started for Free
14 books & journal articles
-
SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
...Petra bin Tengku Indra Petra v Petra Perdana Bhd [2018] 1 AMR 517; [2018] 2 MLJ 177. 134 See Sumitomo Bank Ltd v Thahir Kartika Ratna [1992] 3 SLR(R) 638 where Lai Kew Chai J (as he then was) discussed bribes and secret commissions and rejected the decision in Lister & Co v Stubbs (1890) 45......
-
NAVIGATING THE MAZE
...v Gulliver[1967] 2 AC 134 at 145. 40Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver[1967] 2 AC 134 at 144–145. 41Sumitomo Bank v Thahir Kartika Ratna[1992] 3 SLR(R) 638 at [241]–[242], per Lai Kew Chai J. The decision was affirmed by the Singapore Court of Appeal in Thahir Kartika Ratna v PT Pertambangan M......
-
UNAUTHORISED FIDUCIARY GAINS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
...in Equity”[1988] LMCLQ 128 at 133. 17 For the view that a constructive trust was imposed, see Sumitomo Bank Ltd v Thahir Kartika Ratna[1992] 3 SLR(R) 638 at [241] and Attorney-General for Hong Kong v Reid[1994] 1 AC 324 at 338. See also Peter Millett, “Bribes and Secret Commissions Again”(2......
-
UNDUE INFLUENCE, UNCONSCIONABILITY AND GOOD FAITH
...AC 127 at 135 (PC). 96 [1985] AC 686 at 709. 97 See Kartika Ratna Thahir v Pt Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (Pertamina)[1993] 1 SLR 735 (Lai J), affd [1994] 3 SLR 257; Attorney General of Hong Kong v Reid[1994] AC 324 (PC); Lord Napier and Ettrick v Hunter[1993] AC 713 at 738, Bir......
Get Started for Free