Soh Beng Tee & Company Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date09 May 2007
Date09 May 2007
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 100 of 2006
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
165 cases
  • TMM Division Maritima SA de CV v Pacific Richfield Marine Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 23 September 2013
    ...Alan s/o Anant Kulkarni, Re [2007] 1 SLR (R) 85; [2007] 1 SLR 85 (refd) Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] 3 SLR (R) 86; [2007] 3 SLR 86 (folld) Sovarex SA v Romero Alvarez SA [2011] 2 Lloyd's Rep 320 (refd) Sui Southern Gas Co Ltd v Habibullah Coastal Power Co......
  • PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation (Indonesia)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • Invalid date
    ...jurisdiction. There was no breach of the rules of natural justice In Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] 3 SLR(R) 86, the Court of Appeal held at [26] that an applicant challenging an award on the basis of a breach of natural justice has to establish: which rule......
  • Far East Holdings Bhd and Another v Majlis Ugama Islam dan Adat Resam Melayu Pahang (and 2 Other Appeals)
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • MCST Plan No 301 v Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 10 November 2010
    ...the context of a breach of the hearing rule in arbitration proceedings (see Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd [2007] 3 SLR(R) 86 at [91]): If … the same result could or would ultimately have been attained, or if it can be shown that the complainant could not have pre......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
17 books & journal articles
  • THE ARBITRATION AND LITIGATION OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDER DISPUTES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...stay as the public interest issue is better disposed of by the courts. 98 See Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd[2007] 3 SLR(R) 86 at [59] and [65]. See also Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd v L W Infrastructure Pte Ltd[2012] 2 SLR 1040 at [21] and [40] and TMM Divisi......
  • WRITING A PERSUASIVE APPELLATE BRIEF
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...58 In recent cases, even the position in civil law principles was referred to: Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd[2007] 3 SLR 86 (“Fairmount”)at [42]; Sunny Metal, supra n 47. 59 Low Siew Ling, “Citing Legal Authorities in Court”(2004) 16 SAcLJ 168. This is not to sug......
  • Arbitration
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...if there was any blamein the arbitral process: BLC v BLB at [85], citing Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmont Development PteLtd[2007] 3 SLR(R) 86 at [65(f)]. 4.32 The Court of Appeal found that the arbitrator had addressed his mind to the receivables counterclaim and did render a decision ......
  • LEX ARBITRI, PROCEDURAL LAW AND THE SEAT OF ARBITRATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd [2013] 1 SLR 125 at [56]. See also Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Development Pte Ltd[2007] 3 SLR(R) 86. Other fundamental procedural norms might include, for example, condemnation of awards procured by corruption, or tribunals lacking neces......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT