Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd

JurisdictionSingapore
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
JudgeBelinda Ang Saw Ean J
Judgment Date06 February 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] SGCA 5
Citation[2006] SGCA 5
Published date07 February 2006
Year2006
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 58 of 2005
Date06 February 2006
Subject MatterExclusion clauses,Damages,Whether respondent breaching lease agreement by such conduct,Remedies,Admissibility of evidence,Whether common assumptions arrived at prior to execution of contract admissible as evidence of factual background to aid in interpretation of contract,Respondent tapping into leased facilities to transmit cable television signals to other types of properties,Clause excluding liability for "any indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages (including, without limitation, damages for harm to business, lost revenues, or lost profits)",Lease of appellant's facilities to respondent for cable television roll-out to high-rise residential properties,Whether compensatory damages for breach of contract may be awarded where no loss resulting from breach,Whether exclusion clause precluding appellant's claim for loss of revenue from prospective lease of facilities to respondent for cable television roll-out to properties not covered by existing lease,Breach,Whether any estoppel by convention arising from such common assumptions so as to bar appellant from challenging respondent's tapping,Contractual terms,Contract
Plaintiff CounselTan Kok Quan SC, Kannan Ramesh, Sean Tan Kim Kang and Lam Sin Yee (Tan Kok Quan Partnership)
Defendant CounselPhilip Jeyaretnam SC, Low Chai Chong and Ajinderpal Singh (Rodyk and Davidson)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
25 cases
  • Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd v
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 June 2013
    ...v Steen Consultants Pte Ltd [2008] 2 SLR (R) 623; [2008] 2 SLR 623 (refd) Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd [2006] 2 SLR (R) 195; [2006] 2 SLR 195 (folld) Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd v Burgundy Global Exploration Corp [2010] 2 SLR 821 (refd) Rule......
  • Chng Bee Kheng v Chng Eng Chye
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 26 February 2013
    ...by convention to operate, the following elements must be present (see Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd [2006] 2 SLR(R) 195 at [28]; reaffirmed in Travista Development Pte Ltd v Tan Kim Swee Augustine and others [2008] 2 SLR(R) 474 at [31]): the parties must have a......
  • Holland Leedon Pte Ltd v Metalform Asia Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 April 2012
    ...clear words be used in the contract to exclude or restrict remedies (Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd [2006] 2 SLR(R) 195 at [52]). In my view, the wording of paragraph 8 of Schedule 2 falls short of this threshold requirement. As a matter of construction, the mea......
  • Smile Inc. Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 31 July 2012
    ...(4th) 522 (refd) Shepherds Investments Ltd v Walters [2007] FSR 15 (distd) Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd [2006] 2 SLR (R) 195; [2006] 2 SLR 195 (distd) Sir W C Leng & Co Ltd v Andrews [1909] 1 Ch 763 (folld) Thorsten Nordenfelt (Pauper) v The Maxim Nordenfelt G......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd[2005] 2 SLR 509, Singapore Telecommunications Ltd v Starhub Cable Vision Ltd[2006] 2 SLR 195 and Sandar Aung v Parkway Hospitals Singapore Pte Ltd[2007] 2 SLR 891) is to endorse the broader contextual approach, ie, to allow the ad......