Singapore Shooting Association v Singapore Rifle Association
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Judith Prakash JA,Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA,Sundaresh Menon CJ |
| Judgment Date | 20 December 2019 |
| Date | 20 December 2019 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 103 of 2018 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Law Society of Singapore v Hanam, Andrew John
...1 SLR 83 (refd) Mohammad Farid bin Batra v PP [2020] 1 SLR 907 (refd) Singapore Shooting Association v Singapore Rifle Association [2020] 1 SLR 395 (refd) Facts Mr Andrew John Hanam (“Mr Hanam”), the respondent, was a solicitor of 18 years' standing at the material time. He represented P&P ......
-
Law Society of Singapore v Hanam, Andrew John
...in numerous precedents. We illustrate with a few examples. In Singapore Shooting Association and others v Singapore Rifle Association [2020] 1 SLR 395, the Court of Appeal observed at [175] that under r 17(2)(e)(i), “[l]awyers have a professional obligation to ensure that a proper risk-bene......
-
Larpin, Christian Alfred v Kaikhushru Shiavax Nargolwala
...20 Ch D 1 (refd) Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd [1974] 131 CLR 634 (refd) Singapore Shooting Association v Singapore Rifle Association [2020] 1 SLR 395 (refd) Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd [2003] 3 SLR(R) 307; [2003] 3 SLR 307 (refd) Trans-World (Aluminium) Ltd v Cornelder China......
-
Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd
...of the manner in which each side ran its case. In Singapore Shooting Association and others v Singapore Rifle Association [2020] 1 SLR 395, the Court of Appeal took account of parties’ conduct when making no order on the costs of proceedings both in the court below and before it (at [183]).......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Legal Profession
...1151, in which the Court of Appeal repeated the same reminder. 15 See, eg, Singapore Shooting Association v Singapore Rifle Association [2020] 1 SLR 395, discussed in (2019) 20 SAL Ann Rev 587 at 593–595, paras 21.24–21.32; and Jeffrey Pinsler, “Lawyer's Responsibility Not to Pursue a Claim......
-
Comment - LAWYER'S RESPONSIBILITY NOT TO PURSUE A CLAIM OR APPLICATION OR APPEAL FAVOURED BY THE CLIENT WHERE THE INTEREST OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE WILL BE COMPROMISED
...entitled to refer the matter to the Law Society for disciplinary action pursuant to the breach of a relevant rule of the LP(PC)R 2015. 1 [2019] SGCA 83. 2 See Jeffrey Pinsler SC, “Litigation and the Client's Right to Make an Informed Choice” (2008) 20 SAcLJ 21. 3 Singapore Shooting Associat......