Shanghai Electric Group Company Ltd v PT Merak Energi Indonesia
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Judge | Lee Seiu Kin J |
| Judgment Date | 06 January 2010 |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] SGHC 2 |
| Citation | [2010] SGHC 2 |
| Hearing Date | 31 March 2009,09 March 2009,26 May 2009,13 August 2009 |
| Published date | 14 January 2010 |
| Year | 2010 |
| Date | 06 January 2010 |
| Docket Number | Originating Summons No 273 of 2009 |
| Subject Matter | Conflict of Laws |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Christopher Chuah, Cindy Lim and Joanna He (WongPartnership LLP) |
| Defendant Counsel | Hri Kumar Nair SC, Tham Feei Sy and Kristine Ang Li Shan (Drew & Napier LLC) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 cases
- Kejuruteraan Bintai Kindenko Sdn Bhd v Nam Fatt Construction Sdn Bhd
-
Goj 22 851 2018 Signed 1
...of HRH Sheikh Sultan bin Khadifa bin Zayed AlNahyan [2000] 1 SLR (R) 117; and Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd v PT Merak Energi Indonesia [2010] 2 SLR 329)…” [Emphasis Based on the ratio of Sumatec Engineering (supra), with all due respect to the Plaintiff’s counsel, I do not find that any s......
-
Macquarie Bank Ltd v Graceland Industry Pte Ltd
...As to those submissions, Graceland relied, in particular, on Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd v PT Merak Energi Indonesia and another [2010] 2 SLR 329 at [20]; Halsbury’s Laws of Singapore vol 6(2) (LexisNexis, 2017) at para 75.256; Dicey, Morris & Collins, The Conflict of Laws (Sweet & Maxwe......
- Malaysian Refining Company Sdn Bhd v Sumatec Engineering and Construction Sdn Bhd
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Security for performance
...the procedural law of the jurisdiction in which the injunction is sought: see Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd v PT Merak Energi Indonesia [2010] 2 SLr 329. 236 Power Curber International Ltd v National Bank of Kuwait SAK [1981] 3 all Er 607 at 614, per Griiths LJ; United City Merchants (Inve......
-
Case Note
... DEMAND GUARANTEES IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE Conflicts and Confusion Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd v PT Merak Energi Indonesia [2010] 2 SLR 329 This note considers the implications of the Singapore High Court‘s decision in Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd v PT Merak Energi Indonesi......
-
Building and Construction Law
...traditional position in England. In the second decision, the High Court in Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd v PT Merak Energi Indonesia [2010] 2 SLR 329 (‘Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd’) had to consider, inter alia, whether the nature of the relief granted to restrain a call on the bond is a......
-
Conflict of Laws
...The line between matters of substance and procedure are not always clear. Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd v PT Merak Energi Indonesia [2010] 2 SLR 329 explored this distinction vis-�-vis an injunction restraining the defendant from receiving money pursuant to a call on an advance payment o......
Get Started for Free
