Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v PP

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeSundaresh Menon CJ,Andrew Phang Boon Leong JCA,Judith Prakash JCA,Steven Chong JCA,Chao Hick Tin SJ
Judgment Date11 November 2021
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Docket NumberCriminal Appeal No 29 of 2020 and Criminal Motion No 18 of 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v Liang An Wey
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 6 Octubre 2023
    ...and (b) this burden has not been discharged: GCK at [132], [133], [144] and [149(h)]; Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor [2022] 1 SLR 535 at [75]. Further questions – If the evidence is not “unusually If a court finds that a witness’s evidence is not “unusually convincing”, then......
  • Munusamy Ramarmurth v PP
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 27 Octubre 2022
    ...45 (refd) Obeng Comfort v PP [2017] 1 SLR 633 (refd) Ramesh a/l Perumal v PP [2019] 1 SLR 1003 (refd) Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v PP [2022] 1 SLR 535 (refd) Zainal bin Hamad v PP [2018] 2 SLR 1119 (refd) Facts The appellant, Munusamy Ramamurth, was arrested by Central Narcotics Bureau) (“C......
  • Munusamy Ramarmurth v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 27 Octubre 2022
    ...and another appeal [2019] 1 SLR 1003 (“Ramesh a/l Perumal”); Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor and another matter [2022] 1 SLR 535 (“Roshdi”); and most recently, in Arun Ramesh Kumar v Public Prosecutor [2022] 1 SLR 1152 (“Arun Ramesh Kumar”). The defence of “bailment” allows a......
  • Tangaraju s/o Suppiah v PP
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 23 Febrero 2023
    ...PP v Tangaraju s/o Suppiah [2018] SGHC 279 (refd) Rahmat bin Karimon v PP [2021] 2 SLR 860 (folld) Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v PP [2022] 1 SLR 535 (refd) Facts The applicant, Tangaraju s/o Suppiah (the “Applicant”), was charged with abetting one Mogan Valo (“Mogan”) by engaging in a conspi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 Diciembre 2021
    ...Mohd Fuad v Public Prosecutor [2020] 1 SLR 984 at [47]. 3 Muhammad Nabill bin Mohd Fuad v Public Prosecutor [2020] 1 SLR 984 at [4]. 4 [2022] 1 SLR 535. 5 Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor [2022] 1 SLR 535 at [137]. 6 Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor [2022] 1 SLR ......