Re Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 23 April 2013 |
| Date | 23 April 2013 |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeal No 62 of 2012 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
-
Re Bkr
...1 and 2) [2003] 1 WLR 1511 (folld) Muhd Munir v Noor Hidah [1990] 2 SLR (R) 348; [1990] SLR 999 (folld) Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario, Re [2013] 3 SLR 258 (folld) Ng Chye Huey v PP [2007] 2 SLR (R) 106; [2007] 2 SLR 106 (refd) P, Re [2010] Ch 33 (refd) Poh Soon Kiat v Desert Palace Inc [2010] 1......
-
Urf v Urh
...whereas it is well-established that the jurisdiction of a court can only derive from statute: see Re Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario [2013] 3 SLR 258 at [14] and [20]. In UDA, the Court of Appeal reiterated this position at [48] as follows: Further, it is a fundamental tenet of statutory interpre......
-
Muhammad Ridzuan bin Md Ali v PP
...Mahbub Shah v Emperor AIR 1945 PC 118 (folld) Nagaenthran a/l KDharmalingam v PP [2011] 4 SLR 1156 (folld) Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario, Re [2013] 3 SLR 258 (refd) Ng Chye Huey v PP [2007] 2 SLR (R) 106; [2007] 2 SLR 106 (folld) Nguyen Tuong Van v PP [2005] 1 SLR (R) 103; [2005] 1 SLR 103 (ref......
-
Public Prosecutor v Ng Kok Wai
...be established by legislation (“venue provision”): Muhd Munir v Noor Hidah [1990] 2 SLR(R) 348 at [19]; Re Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario [2013] 3 SLR 258 at [13] – [16] and [20]. Section 50 of the State Courts Act 1970 (“State Courts Act”) and s 15(1) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
THE COURT'S DISCRETION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES AND EMERGING IMPLICATIONS IN THE CRIMINAL SPHERE
...is concerned with the powers of the court rather than its jurisdiction. This distinction was underlined in Re Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario[2013] 3 SLR 258 (“Re Nalpon”) at [27]–[40]. As the Court of Appeal pointed out in that case (which concerned the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal to ent......
-
RETHINKING THE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF COURT
...all instances of contempt are sui generis. 50 1999 Rev Ed. 51 (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed) ss 15–17. 52 (Cap 321, 2007 Rev Ed) ss 19 and 50. 53[2013] 3 SLR 258 at [55]. 54 Cap 161, 1994 Rev Ed. 55“The jurisdiction of a court is its authority, however derived, to hear and determine a dispute that ......
-
THE RIGHT TO APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION MADE ON AN INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION
...[2013] 2 SLR 880 at [7]; Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd[2013] 3 SLR 354 at [10]. See also Re Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario[2013] 3 SLR 258 at [14]. 88 Cap 1, 2002 Rev Ed. 89 See Constitutional Reference No 1 of 1995[1995] 1 SLR(R) 803; Planmarine AG v Maritime and Port Authori......
-
Civil Procedure
...Entertainment at [67]–[69] and [72]. Accordingly, the second action was struck out. Jurisdiction 8.57 In Re Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario[2013] 3 SLR 258, the Court of Appeal held that it did not have the requisite jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a decision made under s 82(5) of the Le......
Request a trial to view additional results