Re Conchubar Aromatics Ltd and other matters
Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Judge | Aedit Abdullah JC |
Judgment Date | 17 December 2015 |
Neutral Citation | [2015] SGHC 322 |
Citation | [2015] SGHC 322 |
Hearing Date | 10 December 2015 |
Published date | 05 March 2016 |
Docket Number | Originating Summons Nos 1064, 1065 and 1066 of 2015 |
Plaintiff Counsel | Vergis Abraham and Danny Quah (Providence Law Asia LLC) |
Subject Matter | Companies,Schemes of arrangement |
The three applicant companies applied for and were granted interim stay of proceedings under s 210(10) of the Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) (“the Companies Act”) for 10 weeks or until earlier discharged, ahead of any application for the calling of a creditors’ meeting under s 210(1). A Malaysian decision,
The three applicant companies, Shefford Investments Holding Limited, UVM Investment Corporation, and Conchubar Aromatics Limited, were shareholders in Jurong Aromatics Corporation Pte Ltd (‘JAC”). These shareholdings, as well as shareholdings in SK E&C Jurong Investment Pte Ltd, were the primary assets of the applicants.
JAC ran into difficulties, eventually being put into receivership in September 2015. The Applicants themselves were similarly in some difficulty. While JAC and the Applicants faced difficulties, the Applicants hoped that a restructuring proposal would rehabilitate their position.
The Application As matters were still being negotiated and discussed among various parties, a moratorium was necessary to protect the Applicants’ ability to continue their efforts at restructuring. The Applicants argued that a restraint order under s 210(10) of the Companies Act could be granted independent of the calling of a meeting under 210(1), citing
In the present case the restructuring proposal put forward to the Court was sufficiently particularised to merit due consideration by the creditors. The restructuring would confer some benefit to the Applicants' creditors, who would otherwise obtain nothing.
A creditor, SK Engineering & Construction Co, Ltd appeared, but did not contest the application for the moratorium at this time.
The...To continue reading
Request your trial-
Re Pacific Andes Resources Development Ltd and other matters
...of Navigator Holdings plc [2007] 1 AC 508 (refd) Codere Finance (UK) Ltd, Re [2015] EWHC 3778 (Ch) (folld) Conchubar Aromatics Ltd, Re [2015] SGHC 322 (folld) Contel Corp Ltd, Re [2011] SC (Bda) 14 Com (refd) Drax Holdings Ltd, Re [2004] 1 WLR 1049 (refd) GAE Pty Ltd, Re [1962] VR 252 (not ......
-
Re IM Skaugen SE
...[1990] Ch 744; [1990] 2 All ER 493 (refd) Capgro Leasing Associates, Re 169 BR 305 (ED NY, 1994) (folld) Conchubar Aromatics Ltd, Re [2015] SGHC 322 (folld) Electro Magnetic (S) Ltd v Development Bank of Singapore Ltd [1994] 1 SLR(R) 574; [1994] 1 SLR 734 (folld) Furness v Lilienfield 35 BR......
-
Re Sifan Triyono
...(folld) Aathar Ah Kong Andrew, Re [2019] 3 SLR 1242 HC, (folld) Andrla, Dominic, Re [2019] SGHC 77 (folld) Conchubar Aromatics Ltd, Re [2015] SGHC 322 (refd) Cooper v Fearnley, Re a debtor [1997] BPIR 20 (refd) Davidson v Stanley [2005] BPIR 279 (refd) Fletcher v Vooght [2000] BPIR 435 (ref......
-
Re Taisoo Suk
...815 (folld) CCIC Finance Ltd v Guangdong International Trust & Investment Corp [2005] 2 HKC 589 (folld) Conchubar Aromatics Ltd, Re [2015] SGHC 322 (refd) Cunard Steamship Co Ltd v Salen Reefer Services AB 773 F 2d 452 (1985) (refd) Hong Kong Institute of Education v Aoki Corp [2004] 2 ......
-
DOES JUDICIAL MANAGEMENT IN MALAYSIA SUFFICIENTLY EMBODY A RESCUE CULTURE?
...of Appeal in Pathfinder Strategic Credit LP v Empire Capital Resources Pte Ltd [2019] 2 SLR 77 at [29]. 75 Re Conchubar Aromatics Ltd [2015] SGHC 322 at [4] and [11], per Aedit Abdullah JC. 76 Companies Act 2016 (Act 777) s 420(1). 77 Indeed a court may extend this period pursuant to s 420(......