Ramesh a/l Perumal v PP

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeSundaresh Menon CJ,Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA,Tay Yong Kwang JA
Judgment Date15 March 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Docket NumberCriminal Appeals Nos 57 and 58 of 2017
Date15 March 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
28 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v Aishamudin bin Jamaludin
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 17 July 2020
    ...equally to multiple accused persons in a joint trial. For instance, in Ramesh a/l Perumal v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2019] 1 SLR 1003 (“Ramesh a/l Perumal”), the accused persons, Ramesh and Chander, were jointly tried on separate charges of drug trafficking. We observed that “t......
  • Public Prosecutor v Adaikalaraj a/l Iruthayam & Suresh s/o Krishnan
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 29 June 2020
    ...Chin Seow Noi and others v Public Prosecutor [1993] 3 SLR(R) 566 at [84], and Ramesh A/L Perumal v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2019] 1 SLR 1003 at [60]-[62]; see also Jennifer Marie and Mohamed Faizal Mohamed Abdul Kadir, The Criminal Procedure Code of Singapore: Annotations and C......
  • Muhammad Nabill bin Mohd Fuad v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 31 March 2020
    ...it at the Flat. This would not constitute trafficking, as we held recently in Ramesh a/l Perumal v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2019] 1 SLR 1003 (“Ramesh”) at [110]. In relation to the second charge, the Appellant does not dispute that he had possession of the cannabis (see [3] abo......
  • Public Prosecutor v Lokman bin Abdul Rahman and another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 March 2020
    ...closing submissions were received, I asked parties to submit on the case of Ramesh a/l Perumal v Public Prosecutor and another appeal [2019] 1 SLR 1003 (“Ramesh”) in relation to the bundle of drugs intended for return to Mubin. In Ramesh, one of the accused persons, Chander, had passed the ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Criminal Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...v Imran bin Mohd Arip [2019] SGHC 155 at [76] and [77]. 47 Public Prosecutor v Imran bin Mohd Arip [2019] SGHC 155 at [78]. 48 [2019] 1 SLR 1003. 49 Ramesh a/l Perumal v Public Prosecutor [2019] 1 SLR 1003 at [57]–[58]. 50 Ramesh a/l Perumal v Public Prosecutor [2019] 1 SLR 1003 at [64]. 51......
  • Criminal Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 December 2021
    ...at [88]–[89]. 47 Rajendran s/o Nagarethinam v Public Prosecutor [2021] SGHC 200 at [92], [93], [115] and [121]. 48 [2021] SGCA 103. 49 [2019] 1 SLR 1003. 50 Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor [2021] SGCA 103 at [44]–[70], [89]–[102] and [183]. 51 See para 14.42 above. 52 Roshdi ......