Ram Das v N P v SIA Engineering Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 19 March 2015 |
| Date | 19 March 2015 |
| Docket Number | District Court Appeal No 32 of 2014 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Michael Vaz Lorrain v Singapore Rifle Association
...it cites – CCM Industrial Pte Ltd v Uniquetech Pte Ltd [2009] 2 SLR(R) 20 (“CCM Industrial”) and Ram Das V N P v SIA Engineering Co Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 267 (“Ram Das”). In CCM Industrial, Chan Sek Keong CJ explained the Favourability Requirement in the following terms (at [40]): … The word ‘fa......
-
NTUC Foodfare Co-operative Ltd v SIA Engineering Company Ltd and another
...and another v PT Bumi International Tankers and another appeal [2004] 3 SLR(R) 267 at [20] and Ram Das V N P v SIA Engineering Co Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 267 at [73]. In our judgment, the phrase “dispos[al] of the matter” in O 22A r 3(5) must be interpreted consistently with O 22A r 9(3)(a) to ref......
-
Michael Vaz Lorrain v Singapore Rifle Association
...Man B&W Diesel S E Asia Pte Ltd v PT Bumi International Tankers [2004] 3 SLR(R) 267 at [20] and Ram Das V N P v SIA Engineering Co Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 267 at [73]. In our judgment, the phrase ‘dispos[al] of the matter’ in O 22A r 3(5) must be interpreted consistently with O 22A r 9(3)(a) to re......
-
Inzign Pte Ltd v Associated Spring Asia Pte Ltd
...offer and that for it to be a serious and genuine offer, it should also contain reasonable terms: Ram Das V N v SIA Engineering Co Ltd [2015] 3 SLR 267 at [23]. However, in my view, the term in the Claim OTS requiring the plaintiff to pay costs did not mean that the offer was not a serious ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Litigation
...Ltd [2019] HKCFI 1712 at [6]–[7], per Mimmie Chan J. 1231 ROC Order 22A rule 1 (Sing). 1232 Ram Das VNP v SIA Engineering Co Ltd [2015] SGHC 74 at [23], per Hoo Sheau Peng JC; Lim Geok Lin Andy v Yap Jin Meng Bryan [2017] SGCA 46 at [69]. 1233 ROC Order 22A rule 2 (Sing). 1234 ROC Order 22A......
-
Civil Procedure
...decisions on offers to settle were clarified or departed from. 8.92 The High Court's decision in Ram Das VNP v SIA Engineering Co Ltd[2015] 3 SLR 267 arose in the context of a bifurcated trial in which the issue of liability was first dealt with. Two offers to settle were made, one each fro......