Public Prosecutor v NF
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 21 September 2006 |
| Date | 21 September 2006 |
| Docket Number | Criminal Case No 22 of 2006 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
138 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v Mohammed Liton Mohammed Syeed Mallik
...sexual assaults or violence by the offender against the victim. 94 These guidelines were comprehensively reviewed by Rajah J in PP v NF [2006] 4 SLR 849 (“NF”). Referring to the case of Millberry ([93] supra), where the English Court of Appeal reviewed the sentencing practice of the English......
-
Fricker Oliver v PP
...similar to the present offences so as to justify a longer sentence on the basis of specific deterrence (see Public Prosecutor v NF [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849 (“NF”) at [69]). Another relevant consideration is the length of time between the previous conviction and the present offences, since a “sub......
-
PP v Shamsul bin Sa'at
...aggravating or mitigating factors is ten years’ imprisonment in a contested case, in addition to six strokes of the cane. In PP v NF [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849 (“PP v NF”), V K Rajah J (as he then was) considered R v William Christopher Millberry [2003] 2 Cr App R (S) 31 (“Millberry”) and adopted ......
-
PP v Amayapan Kodanpany
...There were no convictions for sexual offences or offences against young persons. As V K Rajah J stated in Public Prosecutor v NF [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849 at [69], when he was sentencing an accused person who had previous convictions for housebreaking and theft, and drug trafficking and consumpti......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...sentencing. 13.106 The High Court noted that the sentencing tariffs for offences of rape have been laid down in Public Prosecutor v NF[2006] 4 SLR(R) 849, and endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Public Prosecutor v Mohammed Liton Mohammed Syeed Mallik[2008] 1 SLR(R) 601 and Public Prosecutor......
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...[2006] 1 SLR(R) 265; Public Prosecutor v Fernando Payagala Waduge Malitha Kumar [2007] 2 SLR(R) 334; and Public Prosecutor v NF [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849. 84 [2021] 2 SLR 642. 85 Teo Seng Tiong v Public Prosecutor [2021] 2 SLR 642 at [104]. 86 Teo Seng Tiong v Public Prosecutor [2021] 2 SLR 642 a......
-
JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
...Prosecutor [2017] 2 SLR 449 at [12]–[22], pointing out that the prior framework for sentencing in rape cases in Public Prosecutor v NF [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849 resulted in clustering of sentences and overall conceptual incoherence, necessitating a revision of the sentencing benchmark. 143 See On......
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...Double jeopardy 1.77 More specifically, sentencing principles are subject to norms in the form of constitutional liberties. In PP v NF[2006] 4 SLR 849 at [66], V K Rajah J (as he then was) in determining sentencing for a case of familial rape noted in relation to an offender”s past criminal......
Get Started for Free