Public Prosecutor v Goh Kah Seng
Jurisdiction | Singapore |
Judge | May Lucia Mesenas |
Judgment Date | 01 October 2014 |
Neutral Citation | [2014] SGDC 377 |
Hearing Date | 10 September 2014 |
Citation | [2014] SGDC 377 |
Published date | 22 January 2016 |
Court | District Court (Singapore) |
Docket Number | DAC No. 907384 of 2014 & Ors |
Defendant Counsel | Mr Louis Joseph (M/s Regent Law LLC),Mr Stephen Yeo Zhi Yuan (Attorney-General's Chambers) |
Year | 2014 |
The accused pleaded guilty to one count under the Moneylenders Act (Cap 188, 2010 Rev Ed) which related to acts of harassment, in particular, by defacing the door unit of one Malay occupant (who was also a debtor) by throwing pig’s innards on the said door and also defacing the wall of the same unit by affixing a piece of paper, with “O$P$ XXXXX” written in blue ink, on the said wall. One other similar charge of harassment (of defacing the door of another unit by splashing it with coffee and defacing the wall of the said unit by affixing a piece of white paper, with the details of the debtor written in blue ink, on the said wall), was taken into consideration for the purposes of sentencing.
The accused was convicted and sentenced to fifteen months’ imprisonment and three strokes of the cane for the proceeded charge. Dissatisfied with the sentence, the accused filed a Notice of Appeal against the sentence on 16 September 2014. The accused is currently serving sentence and his earliest date of release is on 11 July 2015.
Summary of Facts The accused admitted to the Statement of Facts pertaining to the above charge, without qualification. He was thus convicted on the proceeded charge accordingly. The salient points are as follows:
In 1999, the accused was previously sentenced to reformative training for a period of 3 years for the following offences of voluntarily causing hurt (section 323 Penal Code Cap 224), being a member of an unlawful assembly (section 143 of the Penal Code Cap 224) and criminal intimidation (section 506 of the Penal Code Cap 224).
Prosecution’s SubmissionsThe prosecution had urged this Court to consider imposing a sentence of fifteen months’ imprisonment and three strokes of the cane, specifically highlighting the aggravating fact that the accused had thrown pig’s innards at a Malay occupant’s unit which was clearly offensive to the victim’s religious sensitivities. Similar sentences were meted out (for similar acts of harassment where pieces of pork were either hung on the main door or soup made of pork ribs (“Bak Kut Teh”) were thrown at the gate or door of Muslim households (see table of relevant sentencing precedents tendered).
MitigationThe accused is currently 32 years old. He had pleaded guilty as a ‘sign of his contrition and regret for the wrong done’. He works as a food stall assistant in a night market. He is married with two school-going children and is the primary caregiver of his children and also financially supports the household. Further, he also financially supports his aged parents, both of whom have health ailments. In particular, his mother who had breast cancer in 2009, and his father who has a heart condition, are currently both on long term medication according to what was stated in counsel’s written mitigation. His mother is currently in remission.
Turning to the table of sentencing precedents highlighted by the prosecution, counsel urged this court to consider imposing a sentence below fifteen months’ imprisonment which was similar to the case of
To continue reading
Request your trial