Prathib s/o M Balan v PP
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | See Kee Oon J |
| Judgment Date | 22 November 2017 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Appeal No 8 of 2017 |
| Date | 22 November 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
22 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v Rozilawaty binte Eddy Rosmanah
...her 12-month disqualification was from the date of release from prison. 7 For completeness, see Prathib s/o M Balan v Public Prosecutor [2017] SGHC 303 at 8 Public Prosecutor v Abdul Hameed s/o Abdul Rahman and Another [1997] SGHC 136 at [7], and re-affirmed in Public Prosecutor v Mohammad ......
-
Public Prosecutor v Chinnathambi Gunasekaran
...[9], and Sivakumar s/o Rajoo v Public Prosecutor [2002] 1 SLR(R) 265 at [17] and [25]. See also Prathib s/o M Balan v Public Prosecutor [2017] SGHC 303 at 32 Malaysian Criminal Appeal Court in Public Prosecutor v Hiew Chin Fong [1988] 1 MLJ 467, which was endorsed in Chua Chye Tiong v Publi......
-
Public Prosecutor v Lim Choon Leong, Aaron
...all classes of vehicles for 12 months (see, for example, Sulaiman bin Mohd Hassan v PP [2021] 5 SLR 763 and Prathib s/o M Balan v PP [2018] 3 SLR 1066). The Prosecution submitted for an imprisonment term of two to four weeks, while the Defence submitted for an imprisonment term of one week.......
-
Public Prosecutor v Joye Goh Hui Ci
...special reasons is stringent and is only satisfied in very exceptional circumstances: see also Prathib s/o M Balan v Public Prosecutor [2017] SGHC 303 at [9]-[11]. The Act is construed strictly in order to preserve its policy of protecting road users: Chua Chye Tiong v Public Prosecutor [20......
Get Started for Free