PP v Pang Chie Wei

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeSundaresh Menon CJ,Andrew Phang Boon Leong JCA,Judith Prakash JCA,Tay Yong Kwang JCA,Steven Chong JCA
Judgment Date01 November 2021
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Docket NumberCriminal Motions Nos 11, 12, 13 and 14 of 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v AG
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 29 March 2022
    ...PP v Mohd Ariffan bin Mohd Hassan [2018] 1 SLR 544 (refd) PP v Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam [2011] 2 SLR 830 (refd) PP v Pang Chie Wei [2022] 1 SLR 452 (refd) Ramalingam Ravinthran v AG [2012] 2 SLR 49 (refd) Sanjay Krishnan v PP [2022] SGCA 21 (refd) Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin v PP [2021] ......
  • Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed and others v Attorney-General
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 25 May 2023
    ...a concluded criminal appeal is no different from that under the statutory regime: Public Prosecutor v Pang Chie Wei and other matters [2022] 1 SLR 452 at [30]. As such, if the material put forth by an applicant does not satisfy the requirements set out under s 394J of the CPC, the court can......
  • Iskandar bin Rahmat and others v Attorney-General and another
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 4 August 2022
    ...now say that he had been denied a right to a fair trial. And more recently, in Public Prosecutor v Pang Chie Wei and other matters [2022] 1 SLR 452, we set out the position on the review powers in general as follows at [70]: Having surveyed the English authorities, we consider that an appel......
  • A Steven s/o Paul Raj v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 28 February 2023
    ...court’s statutory power to review its earlier decision under s 394I of the CPC: see Public Prosecutor v Pang Chie Wei and other matters [2022] 1 SLR 452 (“Pang Chie Wei”) at [13]. An applicant’s choice between these two avenues would not affect the substance of the review application since ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT