PP v Ong Chee Heng
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Chao Hick Tin JA |
| Judgment Date | 28 August 2017 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Appeal No 9303 of 2016 |
| Date | 28 August 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v Faizal Bin Mustaffa
...a real danger posed to innocent bystanders who may be caught up in the violence. As made clear by Chao Hick Tin JA in PP v Ong Chee Heng [2017] 5 SLR 876 at [45] “…the fact that an offence – particularly a violence-related offence – is committed in a public place will be an aggravating fact......
-
Public Prosecutor v Haslinda Binte Ismail
...by getting Hasmah’s assistance. This resulted in the accused and Hasmah jointly attacking the victim with pliers. In PP v Ong Chee Heng [2017] SGHC 213 at [33], the High Court observed that there are generally three reasons why group violence is regarded as aggravating: Greater harm may res......
-
Public Prosecutor v Nirmal Singh
...that an offender chooses to commit the offence in a public place is a factor that may enhanced his culpability…” (see PP v Ong Chee Heng [2017] SGHC 213 at [45]). In the present case, there was actual disruption caused to traffic and the incident was also witnessed by members of the public.......
-
Public Prosecutor v Mohammmad Ariff Bin Suyuti
...place. The conduct of the accused had the potential to cause fear and alarm and pose a danger to the public (see PP v Ong Chee Heng [2017] 5 SLR 876 at [45]). The accused re-offended while on court bail. The prosecution also tendered a table of sentencing precedents involving assaults on pu......
Get Started for Free