Pollmann, Christian Joachim v Ye Xianrong
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Judge | Vinodh Coomaraswamy J |
| Judgment Date | 26 April 2021 |
| Docket Number | Suit No 908 of 2015 (Assessment of Damages No 1 of 2020) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Muhammad Adam bin Muhammad Lee v Tay Jia Rong Sean
...(not folld) Poh Huat Heng Corp Pte Ltd v Hafizul Islam Kofil Uddin [2012] 3 SLR 1003 (refd) Pollmann, Christian Joachim v Ye Xianrong [2021] 5 SLR 1111 (refd) Quek Yen Fei Kenneth v Yeo Chye Huat [2016] 3 SLR 1106, HC (folld) Quek Yen Fei Kenneth v Yeo Chye Huat [2017] 2 SLR 229, CA (folld)......
-
Radhakrishnan Naidu s/o Balram v Esa'ri bin Samad
...(CA)”), save that the discount rate will be 4.25% per annum, based on the recent decision in Christian Joachim Pollmann v Ye Xianrong [2021] SGHC 77 (“Pollmann”) at [75] per Vinodh Coomaraswamy J. My views on the individual items are as follows. I find that P is entitled to the cost of phys......
