Pannirselvam s/o Anthonisamy v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Judgment Date | 02 February 2005 |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Appeal No 93 of 2004 |
| Date | 02 February 2005 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
[2006] 4 SLR 10
...2 SLR 338 (folld) Lwee Kwi Ling Mary v Quek Chin Huat [2003] 2 SLR (R) 145; [2003] 2 SLR 145 (refd) Pannirselvam s/o Anthonisamy v PP [2005] 1 SLR (R) 784; [2005] 1 SLR 784 (refd) Phua Song Hua v PP [2004] SGHC 33 (refd) PP v Diki Zulkarnaini bin Saini District Arrest Cases Nos 57026 of 200......
-
Public Prosecutor v Tan Chui Yun Joselyn
...rejecting their evidence. 265. Yong Pung How CJ had made the following observation in Pannirselvam s/o Anthonisamy v Public Prosecutor, [2005] 1 SLR 784; [2005] SGHC 26 “The common thread running through the judge’s explanations of why he found the various witnesses unreliable was that they......
-
Tan Kay Beng v Public Prosecutor
...with and convicted of rioting: Phua Song Hua v Public Prosecutor [2004] SGHC 33; Pannirselvam s/o Anthonisamy v Public Prosecutor [2005] 1 SLR 784. Rioting is a far cry from the factual matrix of the present appeal. Therefore, even at the most general level, Caird is not instructive in this......
-
Muhammad Fazli Bin Abdul Razak v Public Prosecutor
...the injuries suffered by the victim underscored the viciousness of the attack. 36. More importantly, in Pannirselvam s/o Anthonisamy v PP [2005] SGHC 26, the High Court, in dismissing an appeal against conviction and sentence for an offence of rioting, noted the following at para. “The basi......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...after being detained for shoplifting attracted a strong inference of guilt. This issue was revisited in Pannirselvam s/o Anthonisamy v PP[2005] 1 SLR 784. The appellant had been charged with rioting at a nightclub where he was employed as a bouncer. The evidence showed that the appellant st......
