OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-communications Development Authority of Singapore

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date14 March 2013
Date14 March 2013
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 81 of 2012 (Summons No 3702 of 2012)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 cases
  • Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 25 April 2013
    ...Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 (refd) Open Net Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore [2013] 2 SLR 880 (folld) Planmarine AG v Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore [1999] 1 SLR (R) 669; [1999] 2 SLR 1 (folld) PP v Low Kok Heng [2007] 4 SLR ......
  • The ‘Nasco Gem’
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 7 January 2014
    ...view that by virtue of the recent Court of Appeal decisions in Open Net Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore[2013] 2 SLR 880 (‘Opennet’) and Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd[2013] 3 SLR 354 (‘Dorsey’) clarifying the 2010 amendments to the SCJA, an......
  • Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP v Celestial Nutrifoods Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 8 April 2015
    ...v Kao Wei Tseng [1990] 1 SLR (R) 315; [1990] SLR 29 (refd) Open Net Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore [2013] 2 SLR 880 (folld) PFTZM Ltd, Re [1995] BCC 280 (refd) Rank Xerox (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Ultra Marketing Pte Ltd [1991] 2 SLR (R) 912; [1992] 1 SLR 73 (r......
  • PT Bakrie Investindo v Global Distressed Alpha Fund 1 Ltd Partnership
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 25 September 2013
    ...[2013] 3 SLR 354 (refd) Fagot v Gaches [1943] 1 KB 10 (refd) Open Net Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore [2013] 2 SLR 880 (refd) PP v Low Kok Heng [2007] 4 SLR (R) 183; [2007] 4 SLR 183 (refd) Republic of Costa Rica v Strousberg (1880) 16 Ch D 8 (refd) Sassoon ......
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • RETHINKING THE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF COURT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...to the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed). OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore[2013] 2 SLR 880 at [51] has rationalised s 34 thus: the right to appeal is only meant to be curtailed for interlocutory applications which do not finally d......
  • THE IDEALS IN THE PROPOSED RULES OF COURT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December - January 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...powers on the Rules Committee to make the Rules of Court. In OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-communications Development Authority of Singapore [2013] 2 SLR 880 at [15], Chao Hick Tin JA stated that the court should give the expression “interlocutory application” in para (e) of the Fifth Schedule to ......
  • THE RIGHT TO APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION MADE ON AN INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...Phang and V K Rajah JJA. In the second case, the Court of Appeal comprised Sundaresh Menon CJ, and Chao Hick Tin and V K Rajah JJA. 6 [2013] 2 SLR 880. 7 [2013] 3 SLR 354. 8 Jeffrey Pinsler, Civil Justice in Singapore — Developments in the Course of the 20th Century (Butterworths Asia, 2000......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...of these amendments were examined for the first time in OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-communications Development Authority of Singapore[2013] 2 SLR 880 (‘OpenNet’). 8.5 In OpenNet, the Court of Appeal considered the issue of whether leave of court was required to appeal against an order made by a ......
  • Get Started for Free