OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-communications Development Authority of Singapore

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date14 March 2013
Date14 March 2013
Docket NumberCivil Appeal No 81 of 2012 (Summons No 3702 of 2012)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 cases
  • Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 25 April 2013
    ...Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 (refd) Open Net Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore [2013] 2 SLR 880 (folld) Planmarine AG v Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore [1999] 1 SLR (R) 669; [1999] 2 SLR 1 (folld) PP v Low Kok Heng [2007] 4 SLR ......
  • The ‘Nasco Gem’
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 7 January 2014
    ...view that by virtue of the recent Court of Appeal decisions in Open Net Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore[2013] 2 SLR 880 (‘Opennet’) and Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group Pte Ltd[2013] 3 SLR 354 (‘Dorsey’) clarifying the 2010 amendments to the SCJA, an......
  • Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP v Celestial Nutrifoods Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 8 April 2015
    ...v Kao Wei Tseng [1990] 1 SLR (R) 315; [1990] SLR 29 (refd) Open Net Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore [2013] 2 SLR 880 (folld) PFTZM Ltd, Re [1995] BCC 280 (refd) Rank Xerox (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Ultra Marketing Pte Ltd [1991] 2 SLR (R) 912; [1992] 1 SLR 73 (r......
  • PT Bakrie Investindo v Global Distressed Alpha Fund 1 Ltd Partnership
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 25 September 2013
    ...[2013] 3 SLR 354 (refd) Fagot v Gaches [1943] 1 KB 10 (refd) Open Net Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore [2013] 2 SLR 880 (refd) PP v Low Kok Heng [2007] 4 SLR (R) 183; [2007] 4 SLR 183 (refd) Republic of Costa Rica v Strousberg (1880) 16 Ch D 8 (refd) Sassoon ......
  • Get Started for Free
10 books & journal articles
  • RETHINKING THE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONTEMPT OF COURT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...to the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed). OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-Communications Development Authority of Singapore[2013] 2 SLR 880 at [51] has rationalised s 34 thus: the right to appeal is only meant to be curtailed for interlocutory applications which do not finally d......
  • THE IDEALS IN THE PROPOSED RULES OF COURT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...powers on the Rules Committee to make the Rules of Court. In OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-communications Development Authority of Singapore [2013] 2 SLR 880 at [15], Chao Hick Tin JA stated that the court should give the expression “interlocutory application” in para (e) of the Fifth Schedule to ......
  • THE RIGHT TO APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION MADE ON AN INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...Phang and V K Rajah JJA. In the second case, the Court of Appeal comprised Sundaresh Menon CJ, and Chao Hick Tin and V K Rajah JJA. 6 [2013] 2 SLR 880. 7 [2013] 3 SLR 354. 8 Jeffrey Pinsler, Civil Justice in Singapore — Developments in the Course of the 20th Century (Butterworths Asia, 2000......
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...of these amendments were examined for the first time in OpenNet Pte Ltd v Info-communications Development Authority of Singapore[2013] 2 SLR 880 (‘OpenNet’). 8.5 In OpenNet, the Court of Appeal considered the issue of whether leave of court was required to appeal against an order made by a ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT