Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng

JurisdictionSingapore
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
Judgment Date06 February 2013
Docket NumberSuit No 873 of 2009 (Summonses Nos 3849 and 4094 of 2012)
Date06 February 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No. 3175 v K5 Metal Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 7 August 2023
    ...orders. The court also cannot set contractual consent orders aside save for fraud or other vitiating factors: Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng [2013] 2 SLR 442 (“Ng Kiam Bee”) at [15]. More recently, the Court of Appeal stated in Chiang Shirley v Chiang Dong Pheng [2017] 1 SLR 283 at [18]: 18. Seco......
  • Siva Kumar s/o Avadiar v Quek Leng Chuang and others
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 5 November 2020
    ...of the Consent Order impossible. A consent order can be set aside if there is fraud or other vitiating factors: Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng [2013] 2 SLR 442 at [15]. The court’s jurisdiction to interfere with consent judgments is, generally, a very limited one: Chiang Shirley v Chiang Dong Phe......
  • TEL v TEM
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 30 June 2015
    ...(to allegedly reduce maintenance to $1,900) has superseded the Consent Maintenance Order cites the case of Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng [2013] SGHC 31 and quotes from paragraph 15 of that judgment that “It is trite law that a consent order can be set aside if there is fraud or other vitiating f......
1 books & journal articles
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...and orders Amendment of consent judgment 8.37 The amendment of a consent judgment arose for consideration in Ng Kiam Bee v Ng Bee Eng[2013] 2 SLR 442. The parties had settled their dispute concerning the ownership of property and the terms were recorded in a consent judgment. The consent ju......