Mohamed Hiraz Hassim v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 01 February 2005 |
| Date | 01 February 2005 |
| Docket Number | Criminal Revision No 1 of 2005, |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
PlanAssure PAC (formerly known as Patrick Lee PAC) v Gaelic Inns Pte Ltd
...fogginess as to the accuracy and reliability of the figures adopted in the criminal proceedings. In Mohamed Hiraz Hassim v PP [2005] 1 SLR 622 (“Mohamad Hiraz Hassim”), the court cautioned against the blanket acceptance of an admission by an accused where the value of certain goods was in q......
-
Thong Sing Hock v PP
...it strikes at the very essence of the exercise of judicial power (see Ang Poh Chuan v PP [1996] 1 SLR 326, Mohamed Hiraz Hassim v PP [2005] 1 SLR 622). However, it has to be kept in mind that Parliament has conferred this power on the High Court so as to ensure that no potential cases of se......
-
Megastar Entertainment Pte Ltd and Another v Odex Pte Ltd
...that strikes at its basis as an exercise of judicial power by the court below”. Similarly, I made it clear in Mohamed Hiraz Hassim v PP [2005] 1 SLR 622 at [11] that “the court’s powers of revision are exercised sparingly, and only if the court is satisfied that some serious injustice has b......
-
Ng Chye Huey and another v Public Prosecutor
...2 MLJ 243 (refd) Microsoft Corp v SM Summit Holdings Ltd [2000] 1 SLR (R) 423; [2000] 2 SLR 137 (folld) Mohamed Hiraz Hassim v PP [2005] 1 SLR (R) 622; [2005] 1 SLR 622 (refd) Mohamed Razip v PP [1987] SLR (R) 525; [1987] SLR 142 (folld) Mohamed Saleem Ismail, Re [1987] SLR (R) 380; [1987] ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Revenue and Tax Law
...and fines amounting to $216,000 in total were imposed. Valuation for goods and services tax purposes 20.58 In Mohamed Hiraz Hassim v PP[2005] 1 SLR 622, the appellant was found guilty of evading GST by bringing 66 lots of gemstones from Bangkok into Singapore for sale to a Singapore client.......
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...of the sentences to run consecutively. Goods and services tax offences — pegging fine at median level 11.39 In Mohamed Hiraz Hassim v PP[2005] 1 SLR 622, the appellant under-declared the value of 66 lots of gemstones which he imported into Singapore, by producing an invoice purporting to va......