Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date28 June 2013
Date28 June 2013
Docket NumberOriginating Summons No 780 of 2012
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 cases
  • Lee, R v The General Medical Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 28 January 2016
    ...appeal. The High Court's judgment was published on 1 st July 2013. The High Court upheld the SDC's findings (see Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council [2013] SGHC 122 [2013] 3 SLR 900). The High Court of Singapore held that (i) the Claimant had charged grossly excessive fees to her ......
  • Deepak Sharma Law Society of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 26 May 2016
    ...the purpose of Rule 38”. I note that the judgment of the CA in that case is reported as Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council [2013] 3 SLR 900 and I also assume that Mr Winter QC was intending to refer to 1,025,009.37 in local and not British currency. Furthermore, the figure of “1,......
  • Re Fordham, Michael QC
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 5 November 2014
    ...Dr Lim in late 2007 and culminated only in June 2013 with the High Court’s decision in Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council [2013] 3 SLR 900 (“Susan Lim”), which upheld the decision of a Disciplinary Committee appointed by the SMC to convict Dr Lim on 94 charges of professional mis......
  • Deepak Sharma v Law Society of Singapore
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 26 May 2016
    ...the purpose of Rule 38”. I note that the judgment of the CA in that case is reported as Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council [2013] 3 SLR 900 and I also assume that Mr Winter QC was intending to refer to 1,025,009.37 in local and not British currency. Furthermore, the figure of “1,......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Lecture
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...(Academy Publishing, 2014) at p 197. 95 See the decision of the Singapore High Court in Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council [2013] 3 SLR 900 at [52]. 96 Singapore Academy of Law Newsletter (Issue No 1) (March 1989). 97 Imprints of Singapore Law: A Brief History of Legal Publishing......
  • Biomedical Law and Ethics
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...review saw perhaps one of the most significant decisions in professional discipline with Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council[2013] 3 SLR 900 (‘Susan Lim’). This was followed by Pang Ah San v Singapore Medical Council[2014] 1 SLR 1094 (‘Pang Ah San’). There, several aspects of the ......
  • Biomedical Law and Ethics
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...Medical Council [2017] 5 SLR 356 at [46]–[67]. 82 [2005] 2 AC 176 at [28]. 83 [2017] 1 SLR 461 at [71]. 84 See para 6.39 above. 85 [2013] 3 SLR 900. 86 Ang Peng Tiam v Singapore Medical Council [2017] 5 SLR 356 at [69]. 87 See para 6.39 above. 88 Ang Peng Tiam v Singapore Medical Council [2......
  • Biomedical Law and Ethics
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Rev 143 at 158–167, paras 6.47–6.73. 82 See para 6.26 above. 83 Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him Choon [2016] 4 SLR 1086 at [51]. 84 [2013] 3 SLR 900; see also Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him Choon [2016] 4 SLR 1086 at [51]. 85 Singapore Medical Council v Wong Him Choon [2016] 4 SL......
  • Get Started for Free