Lim Kian Soo; R
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Date | 1950 |
| Year | 1950 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v Donohue Enilia
...without any grounds, or if the judge had ignored some relevant provision of law; see Lim Seng Gin v R [1956] MLJ 76 and R v Lim Kian Soo [1950] MLJ 181. 41 In summary, it is indisputable that where the matter involves the trial judge exercising his discretion, this discretion must be judici......
-
MV Balakrishnan v Public Prosecutor
...52 (folld) Public Prosecutor v Mohd Isa [1963] MLJ 135 (folld) Public Prosecutor v Teo Kok Keng [1989] 1 MLJ 198 (refd) R v Lim Kian Soo [1950] MLJ 181 (not folld) Whittall v Kirby [1947] 1 KB 194 (folld) Wong Hong Toy v PP [1985-1986] SLR (R) 656; [1986] SLR 86 (folld) Wong Hong Toy v PP [......
-
Ho Yean Theng Jill v Public Prosecutor
...without any grounds, or if the judge had ignored some relevant provision of law; see Lim Seng Gin v R [1956] MLJ 76 and R v Lim Kian Soo [1950] MLJ 181. [emphasis 41 In Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47, Lord Sterndale MR observed: The discretion must be judicially exercised and therefore the......
-
Kee Leong Bee and Another v Public Prosecutor
...without any grounds, or if the judge had ignored some relevant provision of law; see Lim Seng Gin v R [1956] MLJ 76 and R v Lim Kian Soo [1950] MLJ 181 . 22.The principles involved in the exercise of discretion for the granting of composition were discussed at length in PP v Norzian bin Bin......
Request a trial to view additional results