Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeGeorge Wei J
Judgment Date26 May 2017
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
Docket NumberSuit No 949 of 2016 (Registrar's Appeals Nos 13 and 31 of 2017)
Date26 May 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Hadley James Chilton and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 16 April 2018
    ...112 (folld) Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch [2015] SGHC 52 (distd) Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya [2017] 4 SLR 1124 (refd) Lam Soon (Thailand) Co Ltd v Transpac Capital Pte Ltd [1998] SGHC 328 (refd) Maidstone Palace of Varieties Ltd, [1909] 2 Ch 283 (foll......
  • JPG Enterprise Pte Ltd v Hairspec Private Limited
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 14 January 2020
    ...(Lim Eng Hock Peter v Lin Jian Wei and another [2008] 4 SLR(R) 444 at [23]; see also Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya [2017] 4 SLR 1124 at [38]). The threshold that the applicant has to meet is a high one – the claim must be not just improbable but impossible (Koh Kim Teck v ......
  • Ayaz Ahmed and others v Mustaq Ahmad (alias Mushtaq Ahmad s/o Mustafa) and others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 4 July 2018
    ...acting on behalf of the estate, would not have. The decision of the High Court in Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya [2017] SGHC 120, which Mr Yuen cited, is instructive in this regard. The plaintiff was the wife of a man who died intestate. She commenced an action on behalf of......
  • Sia Chin Sun v Yong Wai Poh
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 18 June 2018
    ...Carolyn v Kao Chai-Chau Linda and others [2017] 4 SLR 1018 (“Carolyn Fong”) at [35] and Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya [2017] 4 SLR 1124 at [41]–[61]. As the facts of Wong Moy are pertinent to my analysis, I set them out in some detail. The appellant, Wong Moy, claimed to b......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...v Kao Chai-Chau Linda [2017] 4 SLR 1018 at [35(b)]. 83 Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn v Kao Chai-Chau Linda [2017] 4 SLR 1018 at [35(c)]. 84 [2017] 4 SLR 1124. 85 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya [2017] 4 SLR 1124 at [36]. 86 [1996] 3 SLR(R) 27. 87 [1995] 2 SLR(R) 407. 88 [2010] 2 SLR ......