Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another

• Jurisdiction: Singapore
• Court: International Commercial Court (Singapore)
• Judge: Kannan Ramesh J,Roger Giles IJ,Anselmo Reyes IJ
• Judgment Date: 21 June 2021
• Neutral Citation: [2021] SGHC(I) 6
• Citation: [2021] SGHC(I) 6
• Subject Matter: Companies,Valuation of shares,Shares
• Published date: 23 June 2021
• Hearing Date: 16 June 2021
• Defendant Counsel: Toh Kian Sing SC, Cheng Wai Yuen, Mark, Soh Yu Xian, Priscilla and Lim Wee Teck, Darren (Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP),Teng Po Yew (Drew & Napier LLC)
• Plaintiff Counsel: Dinesh Dhillon, Lim Dao Kai, Margaret Joan Ling, Dhivya Naidu and Serene Chee Yi Wen (Allen & Gledhill LLP)
• Docket Number: Suit No 4 of 2017

Kannan Ramesh J (delivering the judgment of the court): The final valuation of Kiri’s shares in DyStar

This is our decision on the final value of the 37.57% shareholding of Kiri Industries Ltd (“Kiri”) in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd (“DyStar”). Our decision herein is the culmination of the following judgments: On 3 July 2018, in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd and others and another suit [2018] 5 SLR 1 (the “Main Judgment”), we held (i) at [281(a)] that Senda International Capital Ltd (“Senda”) was to purchase Kiri’s 37.57% shareholding in DyStar (“Kiri’s shares”) based on a valuation to be assessed, and (ii) at [281(b)] that Kiri’s shares were to be valued as at the date of the Main Judgment, ie, 3 July 2018 (“the valuation date”). Our findings in the Main Judgment were upheld on appeal in Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd and others and another appeal [2019] 2 SLR 1. On 12 March 2019, in Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2019] 4 SLR 1, we held, inter alia, that no minority discount for lack of control should be applied to the valuation of Kiri’s shares. This decision was upheld on appeal in Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd and others [2020] 2 SLR 1. On 21 December 2020, in Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2020] SGHC(I) 27 (the “Valuation Judgment”), we provided an interim valuation of DyStar. We found DyStar’s equity value to be US$1,636m as at the valuation date, subject to further adjustments (the Valuation Judgment at [156] and [312]). Nine issues remained outstanding, pertaining to the adjustments to be made to DyStar’s interim valuation. On 17 March 2021, in an oral judgment, we addressed the issues of (i) pre-judgment interest, and (ii) the relief to which Kiri would be entitled if Senda failed to comply with the buy-out order made in [281(a)] of the Main Judgment. On 3 June 2021, in Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd and another [2021] SGHC(I) 2 (the “Valuation Judgment No 2”), we addressed the nine outstanding adjustments to be made to DyStar’s interim valuation. The parties’ experts were directed to tender an agreed calculation for DyStar’s final valuation based on our findings (Valuation Judgment No 2 at [69]).

On 16 June 2021, pursuant to our directions, the parties’ experts tendered an agreed calculation for DyStar’s final valuation....