Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeChao Hick Tin JA
Judgment Date05 April 2016
Neutral Citation[2016] SGCA 21
Year2016
Date05 April 2016
Published date09 April 2016
Hearing Date05 November 2015,23 November 2015
Plaintiff CounselChandra Mohan K Nair (Tan Rajah & Cheah)
Citation[2016] SGCA 21
Defendant CounselFrancis Ng, Zhuo Wenzhao and Marshall Lim (Attorney-General's Chambers)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
Docket NumberCriminal Motion No 24 of 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
39 cases
  • Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v AG
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 29 March 2022
    ...374 (refd) Juma'at bin Samad v PP [1993] 2 SLR(R) 327; [1993] 3 SLR 338 (refd) Kho Jabing v AG [2016] 3 SLR 1273 (refd) Kho Jabing v PP [2016] 3 SLR 135 (refd) Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 (refd) Miya Manik v PP [2021] 2 SLR 1169 (refd) Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v AG [2018] SGHC 1......
  • Dato' Sri Mohd Najib Bin Hj Abdul Razak v. Public Prosecutor
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 31 January 2023
    ...but in terms of life and liberty. As Chao Hick Tin JA aptly said in the Singapore Court of Appeal case of Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGCA 21: “42. However, the cost of error in the criminal process is measured not in monetary terms, but in terms of the liberty and, sometimes, eve......
  • Amarjeet Singh v PP
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 March 2021
    ...741 (refd) James Raj s/o Arokiasamy v PP [2014] 3 SLR 750 (refd) Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v AG [2014] 1 SLR 345 (refd) Kho Jabing v PP [2016] 3 SLR 135 (refd) Kiew Ah Cheng David v PP [2007] 1 SLR(R) 1188; [2007] 1 SLR 1188 (refd) Kim Gwang Seok v PP [2012] 4 SLR 821 (refd) Knight Glenn Je......
  • Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Attorney-General and another matter
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 29 March 2022
    ...not applied in as unyielding a manner as in the civil context, to echo the observation of this court in Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135 (at [1]), there must come a time when the last word of the court is the last word, and that the last full stop in a written judgment is not......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • RIGHTISM, REASONABLENESS AND REVIEW: SECTION 377A OF THE PENAL CODE AND THE QUESTION OF EQUALITY – PART ONE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2022, March 2022
    • 1 March 2022
    ...[2013] 3 SLR 118 at [113]. 65 Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin v Attorney-General [2021] 1 SLR 809 at [63]; Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135 at [50]. 66 A parallel common law development is evident in the flexible approach where greater judicial scrutiny applies to fundamental rights......
  • ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...bin Othman v Public Prosecutor [2018] 2 SLR 1394. 18 Public Prosecutor v Kho Jabing [2015] 2 SLR 112; Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135; Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 1259. 19 The STX Mumbai [2015] 5 SLR 1; The Chem Orchid [2016] 2 SLR 50. 20 Ting Shwu Ping v Sca......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...M Kailasam v Public Prosecutor [2016] 5 SLR 779 at [14]–[16]. 4 Public Prosecutor v Tan Thian Earn [2016] 3 SLR 269 at [62]. 5 [2016] 3 SLR 135 at [125]. 6 Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135 at [125]. 7 Kho Jabing v Attorney-General [2016] 3 SLR 1273 at [9]. 8 [2016] 2 SLR 301 ......
  • Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Rev Ed. 3 See, eg, (2013) 14 SAL Ann Rev 302 at 337–338, paras 14.81–14.83; (2015) 16 SAL Ann Rev 396 at 432–435, paras 14.88–14.95. 4 [2016] 3 SLR 135. 5 See (2013) 14 SAL Ann Rev 302 at 337–338; (2015) 16 SAL Ann Rev 396 at 432–435. 6 Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135 at [44......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT