Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Chao Hick Tin JA |
| Judgment Date | 05 April 2016 |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] SGCA 21 |
| Year | 2016 |
| Date | 05 April 2016 |
| Published date | 09 April 2016 |
| Hearing Date | 05 November 2015,23 November 2015 |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Chandra Mohan K Nair (Tan Rajah & Cheah) |
| Citation | [2016] SGCA 21 |
| Defendant Counsel | Francis Ng, Zhuo Wenzhao and Marshall Lim (Attorney-General's Chambers) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | Criminal Motion No 24 of 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
39 cases
-
Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v AG
...374 (refd) Juma'at bin Samad v PP [1993] 2 SLR(R) 327; [1993] 3 SLR 338 (refd) Kho Jabing v AG [2016] 3 SLR 1273 (refd) Kho Jabing v PP [2016] 3 SLR 135 (refd) Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 (refd) Miya Manik v PP [2021] 2 SLR 1169 (refd) Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v AG [2018] SGHC 1......
-
Dato' Sri Mohd Najib Bin Hj Abdul Razak v. Public Prosecutor
...but in terms of life and liberty. As Chao Hick Tin JA aptly said in the Singapore Court of Appeal case of Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] SGCA 21: “42. However, the cost of error in the criminal process is measured not in monetary terms, but in terms of the liberty and, sometimes, eve......
-
Amarjeet Singh v PP
...741 (refd) James Raj s/o Arokiasamy v PP [2014] 3 SLR 750 (refd) Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v AG [2014] 1 SLR 345 (refd) Kho Jabing v PP [2016] 3 SLR 135 (refd) Kiew Ah Cheng David v PP [2007] 1 SLR(R) 1188; [2007] 1 SLR 1188 (refd) Kim Gwang Seok v PP [2012] 4 SLR 821 (refd) Knight Glenn Je......
-
Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam v Attorney-General and another matter
...not applied in as unyielding a manner as in the civil context, to echo the observation of this court in Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135 (at [1]), there must come a time when the last word of the court is the last word, and that the last full stop in a written judgment is not......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
RIGHTISM, REASONABLENESS AND REVIEW: SECTION 377A OF THE PENAL CODE AND THE QUESTION OF EQUALITY – PART ONE
...[2013] 3 SLR 118 at [113]. 65 Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin v Attorney-General [2021] 1 SLR 809 at [63]; Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135 at [50]. 66 A parallel common law development is evident in the flexible approach where greater judicial scrutiny applies to fundamental rights......
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...bin Othman v Public Prosecutor [2018] 2 SLR 1394. 18 Public Prosecutor v Kho Jabing [2015] 2 SLR 112; Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135; Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 1259. 19 The STX Mumbai [2015] 5 SLR 1; The Chem Orchid [2016] 2 SLR 50. 20 Ting Shwu Ping v Sca......
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...M Kailasam v Public Prosecutor [2016] 5 SLR 779 at [14]–[16]. 4 Public Prosecutor v Tan Thian Earn [2016] 3 SLR 269 at [62]. 5 [2016] 3 SLR 135 at [125]. 6 Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135 at [125]. 7 Kho Jabing v Attorney-General [2016] 3 SLR 1273 at [9]. 8 [2016] 2 SLR 301 ......
-
Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
...Rev Ed. 3 See, eg, (2013) 14 SAL Ann Rev 302 at 337–338, paras 14.81–14.83; (2015) 16 SAL Ann Rev 396 at 432–435, paras 14.88–14.95. 4 [2016] 3 SLR 135. 5 See (2013) 14 SAL Ann Rev 302 at 337–338; (2015) 16 SAL Ann Rev 396 at 432–435. 6 Kho Jabing v Public Prosecutor [2016] 3 SLR 135 at [44......