Jones v R
Jurisdiction | Singapore |
Court | Supreme Court (Singapore) |
Date | 1948 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Kwang Boon Keong Peter v Public Prosecutor
...It is for the Public Prosecutor to decide later whether in such a case the witness should be prosecuted for perjury. In Jones v R [1948] MLJ 182 , Murray-Aynsley CJ said at p 182: These statements can only be used to impeach the credit of the witnesses. That is to say, when these statements......
-
Syed Abdul Aziz and Another v Public Prosecutor
...[1980-1981] SLR 73 (folld) Illian v PP [1988] 1 MLJ 421 (folld) Jamaludin v PP [1991] 2 SLR (R) 256; [1992] 1 SLR 911 (distd) Jones v R [1948] MLJ 182 (refd) Muthusamy v PP [1948] MLJ 57 (refd) PP v Neoh Bean Chye [1974-1976] SLR (R) 61; [1972-1974] SLR 213 (folld) Somwang Phatthanasaeng v ......
-
Public Prosecutor v Sng Siew Ngoh
...3 SLR 785 (folld) Haw Tua Tau v PP [1981-1982] SLR (R) 133; [1980-1981] SLR 73 (refd) Ho Yew Cheng v R [1962] MLJ 437 (refd) Jones v R [1948] MLJ 182 (refd) Lee Lian v PP [1956] MLJ 191 (refd) Morris v R (1987) 163 CLR 454 (refd) Nagalingam v PP [1957] MLJ 196 (refd) Ng Theng Shuang v PP [1......
-
Kwang Boon Keong Peter v Public Prosecutor
...It is for the Public Prosecutor to decide later whether in such a case the witness should be prosecuted for perjury. In Jones v R [1948] MLJ 182 , Murray-Aynsley CJ said at p 182: These statements can only be used to impeach the credit of the witnesses. That is to say, when these statements......
Request a trial to view additional results