Jones v R
| Court | Supreme Court (Singapore) |
| Date | 1948 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Kwang Boon Keong Peter v Public Prosecutor
...It is for the Public Prosecutor to decide later whether in such a case the witness should be prosecuted for perjury. In Jones v R [1948] MLJ 182 , Murray-Aynsley CJ said at p 182: These statements can only be used to impeach the credit of the witnesses. That is to say, when these statements......
-
Kwang Boon Keong Peter v Public Prosecutor
...It is for the Public Prosecutor to decide later whether in such a case the witness should be prosecuted for perjury. In Jones v R [1948] MLJ 182 , Murray-Aynsley CJ said at p 182: These statements can only be used to impeach the credit of the witnesses. That is to say, when these statements......
-
Public Prosecutor v Somwang Phatthanasaeng
...judges did not rely on the s 121 statements as substantive evidence against the accused on any crucial issue of fact: at [36]. Jones v R [1948] MLJ 182 (folld) Muthusamy v PP [1948] MLJ 57 (folld) PP v Wong Yee Sen [1990] 1 MLJ 187 (folld) Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 1985 Rev Ed)s 121 ......