Industrial Commercial Bank v Tan Swa Eng and others and another appeal

CourtCourt of Three Judges (Singapore)
JudgeChao Hick Tin J
Judgment Date26 May 1995
Neutral Citation[1995] SGCA 54
Citation[1995] SGCA 54
Defendant CounselVijay Kumar (Vijay & Co),William Jansen (Jansen Menon & Pnrs),Rajaram Ramiah (Wee Ramayah & Pnrs),R Joethy (Choo & Joethy)
Subject MatterDuty of care,Whether occupiers ought to have known of unusual danger,Tort,Whether occupiers used reasonable care to prevent damage and injury,Invitee,Occupier’s liability,Imputation of knowledge to be based on state of knowledge existing at time of incident
Plaintiff CounselP Selvadurai and Lok Vi Ming (Rodyk & Davidson)
Date26 May 1995
Published date19 September 2003
Docket NumberCivil Appeals Nos 95 and 96

The two claims arose out of the Hotel New World collapse on 15 March 1986. The appellants were the tenants who occupied the ground floor of a building known as Lian Yak Building. Lian Yak Realty Co Pte Ltd were the owners of the building. Ng Khong Lim (Ng), deceased, was at all material times the managing director of Lian Yak Realty Co Pte Ltd.

The first and second respondents in CA 95/94 were the administratrix and co-administrator respectively of the estate of Song Teck Long (Song), deceased. Song was a partner of Song Brothers Trading and Chop Chee Kee who were customers of the appellants.

The first respondent in CA 96/94 was the administrator of the estate of Sit Ah Lak, deceased (Sit) and he was also the third respondent as the widower of Sit. The second respondent was the mother of Sit. Sit was a clerk employed by Chip Soon Aluminium Pte Ltd who were also customers of the appellants.

Brief facts

The construction of the building started in June 1969 and its certificate of fitness was obtained on 22 September 1972. As early as 1974, cracks started to appear in some sections of the building, but on Ng`s instructions these cracks were just patched over with cement. These cracks developed progressively until the building collapsed at 11.15am on 15 March 1986.

The material events which took place that morning, prior to the collapse of the building, were briefly as follows. At about 10am on 15 March 1986, Albert Sim and Cheong Cheng Guan, both bank officers of the appellants who were at the appellants` premises, heard a distant rumbling sound followed by a tremor. They also felt the building vibrate. They and the other staff of the appellants were shocked at first but as the disturbances lasted for only a few seconds, they continued with their work.

At 10.30am, Annie Quek @ Quek Ah Suan, a customer of the appellants, was on her way to the appellants` premises when she saw some cracks on a pillar in the ground floor car park of the building. The watchman of the building then told her to inform her employer who parked at the car park to remove his car from the car park. She further witnessed cement falling off the rear of the building and saw the cracks herself. Hence she proceeded to inform her managing director of the cracks.

Subsequently, she informed Albert Sim and Cheong Cheng Guan of the cracks on a pillar at the ground floor car park. On hearing that the pillar was cracked, Albert Sim was worried that his car might be hit by the cement that was falling off the pillar. He then left the appellants` premises, went to the rear of the building and shifted his car to the basement, thinking that the basement was a safer location.

Thereafter, Albert Sim told the appellants` branch manager, Albert Kan (a victim of the collapse), of the cracks and together they inspected the cracks on a pillar in the car park. After examining the cracks, Albert Kan felt that they posed no danger to his car.

In the meantime, the watchman and some other helpers, under the supervision of Ng, were seen by Albert Sim and Annie Quek putting up a wooden prop at the car park in an obvious attempt to remedy the cracks on the pillar.

At about 11.30am, the building collapsed. 33 persons died in this tragedy including the two deceased, Song and Sit who were at the appellants` premises when the building collapsed.

On 22 March 1986, a commission was issued by the President for an inquiry to be held to determine the cause of the collapse and to make recommendations for such appropriate measures that can be taken to prevent a similar occurrence. The Honourable LP Thean J (as he then was) was appointed the Chairman of the Commission of the Inquiry. The report was published in February 1987.

In 1989, the estates of the two deceased commenced actions for lost years, and their dependants for loss of dependency. Lian Yak Realty Co Pte Ltd and the estate of Ng admitted liability whereas the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review Nbr. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...based on English law prior to the enactment of the UK Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 (c 31) (Industrial Commercial Bank v Tan Swa Eng[1995] 2 SLR(R) 385). Under the pre-1957 rules in England, the liability of an occupier depended on the nature of the entrant to the property. There were three......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal Nbr. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...where the incident took place. 12 Mohd bin Sapri v Soil-Build (Pte) Ltd [1996] 2 SLR(R) 223; Industrial Commercial Bank v Tan Swa Eng[1995] 2 SLR(R) 385. 13 Clerk & Lindsell on Torts (Reginald W M Dias gen ed) (Sweet & Maxwell, 15th Ed, 1982). 14 For a different view, see Michael F Rutter, ......
  • Building and Construction Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review Nbr. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...High Court omitted] 7.75 In determining whether this duty was breached, the court referred to Industrial Commercial Bank v Tan Swa Eng[1995] 2 SLR(R) 385 (applying Roe v Minister of Health[1954] 2 QB 66) where the Court of Appeal held (at [23]) that ‘in assessing whether the appellant had b......
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review Nbr. 2000, December 2000
    • 1 December 2000
    ...sufficient control to be subject to the duty of an occupier. Following Industrial Commercial Bank v Tan Swa Eng & Ors and another appeal[1995] 2 SLR 716, Lai J reiterated (at 132) the 4 conditions which had to be satisfied before liability can attach to occupiers, namely: “(1) the occupier ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT