Indonesia: Twenty Years of Democracy.

AuthorSimandjuntak, Deasy

Indonesia: Twenty Years of Democracy (Elements in Politics and Society in Southeast Asia), by Jamie Davidson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. 78.

For observers of Southeast Asia's politics, there is little doubt that Indonesia's electoral democracy has shown resilience at a time when democracy is retreating elsewhere in region. The country successfully conducted one of the world's largest free and fair elections in 2019 and President Joko Widodo, who ran on a more pluralist platform--at least compared to his rival--won. Yet, democracy is not only about elections, and the new government's policies have shown traces of an "authoritarian" legacy. How can we make sense of the complexity of Indonesia's democracy?

Jamie Davidson's Indonesia: Twenty Years of Democracy offers a comprehensive analysis and useful periodization of the country's democratic trajectory over the past two decades. Indonesia, considered by observers as one of the most democratically "consolidated" nations in the region--although Davidson himself is averse to using the term (p. 4)--has certainly made some gains since the fall of the authoritarian regime in 1998; for example, by the introduction of regional autonomy and direct elections. However, the relatively young democracy continues to face challenges, some of which pertain to the endurance of elements of authoritarianism, as well as systemic corruption. This book does a good job elucidating these key developments.

The author begins with three core arguments. First, he states that Indonesia's democracy looks strong in comparison to other countries', yet much weaker when viewed up close (p. 2). Persistent corruption, collective violence, and growing sectarianism and military influence in the government illustrate some of the shortfalls. Second, in spite of such deficits, democracy should still be the yardstick to gauge the country's performance. Davidson points out that the term "means different things to different people" and consequently draws a rather cautious conclusion that Indonesia's democracy is "an unfinished process replete with conflicts over power, resources, ideas and institutions" (p. 4). Third, Indonesia's current situation should not be evaluated using the framework of "change and continuities" vis-a-vis the New Order, because the past two decades were distinct enough to merit their own examination. Here, Davidson divides me post-Soeharto democratization into three periods: innovation...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT