Haidakota (M) Sdn Bhd v Tan Tiam Chai

JurisdictionSingapore
Year2009
Date2009
CourtCourt of Three Judges (Singapore)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Perbadanan Pengurusan City Plaza v Sigma Elevator (M) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2024
  • TAY ENG TIAN vs KOH KOH KIAN
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
    ...NETWORK SYSTEMS SDN BHD v. AV ASIA SDN BHD [2014] 3 CLJ 915). [32] The Court of Appeal in HAIDAKTA (M) SDN BHD V. TAN TIAM CHAI [2009] 1 CLJ 699 has held that it is an answer to an application October 3, 2021 for security for costs if the plaintiff’s impecuniosity is caused by the defendant......
  • VENKAL APPERALS PVT LTD vs Cry Respond Sdn. Bhd.
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
    ...to pay the costs of a successful defendant.". [7] Similarly in the case of Haidakota (M) Sdn. Bhd. v. Tan Tiam Chai & Another Appeal [2009] 1 CLJ 699 at page (i) "First, the application for security for costs must be made with reasonable promptitude after the issue of the writ. Delay is a g......
  • RUDY PETROLEUM SDN BHD vs HSAP SDN BHD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 2 August 2021
    ...of Defendant not to be exposed to the expense of defending a claim. [12] In Haidakota (M) Sdn BHd v. Tan Tiam Chai & Another Appeal [2009] 1 CLJ 699, the Court of appeal held as ‘[3] Special attention should be paid to the balance that should be drawn between exposing an innocent defendant ......