Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck and Others

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date22 November 2006
Date22 November 2006
Docket NumberOriginating Summons No 950 of 2006
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
141 cases
  • Wing Joo Loong Ginseng Hong (Singapore) Company Pte Ltd v Qinghai Xinyuan Foreign Trade Company Ltd and another
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • Invalid date
  • Adp v Adq
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 19 January 2012
    ...(refd) Fowke v Fowke [1938] Ch 774 (refd) George Hubert Powell v Viola M Cockburn [1977] 2 SCR 218 (refd) Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck [2007] 1 SLR (R) 453; [2007] 1 SLR 453 (folld) Joseph Mathew v Singh Chiranjeev [2010] 1 SLR 338 (refd) L v C [2007] 3 HKLRD 819 (refd) Lee Tat Development Pt......
  • Low Heng Leon Andy v Low Kian Beng Lawrence
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 10 May 2013
    ...1 WLR 1752 (distd) Gabriel Peter & Partners v Wee Chong Jin [1997] 3 SLR (R) 649; [1998] 1 SLR 374 (folld) Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck [2007] 1 SLR (R) 453; [2007] 1 SLR 453 (folld) Goh Swee Fang v Tiah Juah Kim [1994] 3 SLR (R) 556; [1994] 3 SLR 881 (folld) Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Ha......
  • The ‘Bunga Melati 5’
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 21 August 2012
    ...193 (overd) Freeman & Lockyer (A Firm) v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480 (folld) Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck [2007] 1 SLR (R) 453; [2007] 1 SLR 453 (folld) Golden Petroleum, The [1993] 3 SLR (R) 209; [1994] 1 SLR 92 (refd) ‘Iran Amanat’, The Owners of the Motor Vessel ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Civil Procedure
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...estoppel at best and can be likened more to the defence of abuse of process rather than issue estoppel (see Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck[2007] 1 SLR(R) 453 at [41]). This was a more flexible concept necessitating a broad, merits-based judgment which accounted for the public and private intere......
  • Conflict of Laws
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Chong J. 407 Manharlal Trikamdas Mody v Sumikin Bussan International (HK) Ltd [2014] 3 SLR 1161 at [140]–[142], per George Wei JC. 408 [2007] 1 SLR(R) 453 at [28], per Sundaresh Menon JC. 409 Paulus Tannos v Heince Tombak Simanjuntak [2020] 2 SLR 1061 at [39]. 410 It has been said in the co......
  • THE APPLICATION OF THE HENDERSON V HENDERSON RULE IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...in arbitration legislation and the New York Convention. 1Henderson v Henderson(1843) 3 Hare 99 at 115. 2Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck[2007] 1 SLR(R) 453. 3China North Industries Investment Ltd v Chum[2010] 5 HKLRD 1. 4Asia Commercial Finance (M) Bhd v Kawal Teliti Sdn Bhd[1995] 3 MLJ 189. 5Por......