Formula One Licensing BV v Idea Marketing SA

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date13 October 2015
Date13 October 2015
Docket NumberTribunal Appeal No 22 of 2013
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 26 April 2017
    ...and that it has successfully enforced its rights in the mark in Australia and Canada. In Formula One Licensing BV v Idea Marketing SA [2015] 5 SLR 1349, Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) stated (at [66]) that “registrations do not automatically equate to trade mark use”. As for foreign deci......
  • Dr August Wolff GmbH & Company KG Arzneimittel v Combe International Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 25 February 2021
    ...R 2459/2019-4 (folld) Ferrero SPA v Sarika Connoisseur Cafe Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 176 (refd) Formula One Licensing BV v Idea Marketing SA [2015] 5 SLR 1349 (refd) Future Enterprises Pte Ltd v McDonald's Corp [2006] 4 SLR(R) 629; [2006] 4 SLR 629 (folld) Guccio Gucci SpA v Guccitech Industries......
  • Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Company, Ltd v Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 24 August 2021
    ...Ltd's Trade Mark Application [2019] RPC 16 (refd) F (R), Re [1970] 1 QB 385 (folld) Formula One Licensing BV v Idea Marketing SA [2015] 5 SLR 1349 (refd) Hunt-Wesson Inc's Trade Mark Application [1996] RPC 233 (folld) Indtex Trading Ltd v The Otago Rugby Football Union (10 October 2001, HC)......