Engineering Construction Pte Ltd v Attorney General and Another
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Lim Teong Qwee JC |
| Judgment Date | 17 September 1992 |
| Neutral Citation | [1992] SGHC 244 |
| Citation | [1992] SGHC 244 |
| Docket Number | Originating Summons No 527 of 1992,Originating Summons No 768 of 1993 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Philip Jeyaretnam (Helen Yeo & Partners) |
| Date | 20 January 1994 |
| Defendant Counsel | Khong Swee Lin (Chan Cher Boon & Leong),Soh Tze Bian (State Counsel) |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Published date | 19 September 2003 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
LW Infrastructure Pte Ltd v Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd
...Co Ltd, The v The General Accident, Fire, and Life Assurance Corp Ltd [1912] SC 591 (distd) Engineering Construction Pte Ltd v AG [1994] 1 SLR (R) 125; [1994] 1 SLR 687 (distd) Fence Gate Ltd v NEL Construction Ltd (2001) 82 Con LR 41 (folld) Hurst v Bryk [2002] 1 AC 185 (folld) JF Finnegan......
-
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2192 v Regenthill Properties Pte Ltd
...of documents which Regenthill are required to deliver. They relied upon the High Court decision in Engineering Construction Pte Ltd v AG [1993] 1 SLR 390. 15 It will be seen that under O 7 r 3(1) there are two alternative manners in which a plaintiff in an OS could formulate his case. One i......
-
Engineering Construction Pte Ltd v Attorney General and Another
...8.Lim Teong Qwee JC`s judgment which was delivered on 17 September 1992 is reported in Engineering Construction Pte Ltd v A-G [1993] 1 SLR 390. His analysis of the role, duties and obligations of the SO under the contract set out in p 398 and reproduced below is relevant to the issues I wil......
-
Steel Industries Pte Ltd v Deenn Engineering Pte Ltd
...There could not be two arbiters of fact. This position was supported by the authority of Engineering Construction v Attorney General [1994] 1 SLR 687 which decided that the Superintending Officer under the PWD Form of Contract (a position equivalent to that of the architect under the Main C......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Contract administration
...Con LR 26 at 50 [74]–51 [76], per Coulson J (airmed by the Court of appeal). See also Engineering Construction Pte Ltd v A-G (Singapore) [1993] 1 SLr 390 (noted by Powell-Smith, [1993] iCLr 521). 311 Token Construction Co Ltd v Charlton Estates Ltd (1973) 1 BLr 48 at 54, per Edmund Davies L......
-
Building and Construction Law
...the main contractor and the employer. In reaching this conclusion, she followed Engineering Construction Pte Ltd v Attorney-General[1994] 1 SLR 687. Direct payments to sub-contractors and schemes of arrangement 5.15 Nominated sub-contractors are chosen by the employer, but do not enter into......