Doshi v Doshi

JurisdictionSingapore
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
Judgment Date02 September 1965
Docket NumberDivorce No 36 of 1965
Date02 September 1965

[1965] SGHC 13

High Court

A V Winslow J

Divorce No 36 of 1965

Doshi
Plaintiff
and
Doshi
Defendant

Punch Coomaraswamy (Braddell Brothers) for the petitioner

Lee Boon Siong (Drew & Napier) for the respondent

Ho Thian Cheh for the State Advocate-General, amicus curiae.

Reference by the Registrar of Titles, Selangor, under s 238 of the Land Code (Cap 138) [1937] MLJ 9 (refd)

Revised Edition of the Laws (Annual Supplements) Ordinance 1956 (No 10 of1956)ss 4, 8 (1) (consd)

Women's Charter 1961 (No 18 of 1961)ss 82 (1), 166 (consd)

Courts and Jurisdiction–High Court–Divorce proceedings–Marriage solemnised outside Singapore in 1957–Whether court having jurisdiction to dissolve marriage–Sections 82 (1), 166 Women's Charter 1961 (No 18 of 1961)–Sections 4, 8 (1) Revised Edition of the Laws (Annual Supplements) Ordinance 1956 (No 10 of 1956)–Family Law–Divorce–Jurisdiction–Marriage solemnised outside Singapore in 1957–Whether High Court having jurisdiction to dissolve marriage–Sections 82 (1), 166 Women's Charter 1961 (No 18 of 1961)–Sections 4, 8 (1) Revised Edition of the Laws (Annual Supplements) Ordinance 1956 (No 10 of 1956)–Statutory Interpretation–Statutes–Law revision–Unauthorised amendment–Conclusiveness of Annual Supplement–Sections 4, 8 (1) Revised Edition of the Laws (Annual Supplements) Ordinance 1956 (No 10 of 1956)

The petitioner, a Singapore citizen domiciled in Singapore, sought the dissolution of his marriage with the respondent on the ground of her desertion. The divorce was uncontested and the only issue was whether his marriage to the respondent, which took place in Ipoh according to Hindu customary rites in May 1957, was a marriage which the court had jurisdiction to dissolve as the Annual Supplement to the Laws of Singapore for 1961 issued in 1964 limited the application of s 166 of the Women's Charter 1961 (No 18 of 1961) to marriages solemnised “in Singapore” before the coming into operation of the Charter on 15 September 1961. The State Advocate-General conceded that the 1964 addition of the words “in Singapore” was not authorised by s 4 of the Revised Edition of the Laws (Annual Supplements) Ordinance 1956 (No 10 of 1956), but relied on s 8 (1) of the Revised Edition of the Laws (Annual Supplements) Ordinance 1956 to justify the conclusiveness of the 1961 Annual Supplement.

Held, allowing the petition:

(1) Section 8 (1) of the Revised Edition of the Laws (Annual Supplements) Ordinance 1956 provided...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT