CPIT Investments Ltd v Qilin World Capital Ltd and another
Jurisdiction | Singapore |
Court | International Commercial Court (Singapore) |
Judge | Vivian Ramsey IJ |
Judgment Date | 28 July 2017 |
Neutral Citation | [2017] SGHC(I) 7 |
Citation | [2017] SGHC(I) 7 |
Plaintiff Counsel | Tan Poh Ling Wendy and Chua Han Yuan, Kenneth (Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC) |
Docket Number | Suit No 5 of 2016 (Summons No 21 of 2017) |
Date | 28 July 2017 |
Defendant Counsel | Renganathan Nandakumar, Sharon Chong Chin Yee and Nandhu (RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP) |
Hearing Date | 28 July 2017 |
Published date | 18 August 2017 |
Subject Matter | Civil Procedure,Stay of execution |
This judgment deals with the principles to be applied to an application to stay execution of a judgment in the Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) pending an appeal.
Summons No 21 of 2017 (“the Summons”) is an application by the Second Defendant (“Qilin”) to seek a stay of execution of my judgment handed down in Suit No 5 of 2016 on 17 July 2017 (“the Stay Application”): see
In the Judgment, I found there was a constructive trust in respect of proceeds which had come from an unlawful sale for HK$62.5m of the 25,000,000 shares in Millennium Pacific Group Holdings Limited (“Millennium”) that the Plaintiff (“CPIT”) had provided to Qilin in exchange for a non-recourse loan (“the Pledged Shares”), leading to HK$31.25m being held on trust by Qilin as the proceeds of the sale of the Pledged Shares (at [300(a)]). I also ordered an account be taken of the profits made by Qilin in respect of that sum held on trust (at [300(b)]).
BackgroundPursuant to the terms of a consent order dated 12 February 2016 and a solicitors’ undertaking dated 15 February 2016, the sum of HK$27,532,000 is currently held in Qilin’s solicitors’ trust account as security for CPIT’s claim in these proceedings. The sum is to be released within 14 days from receipt of a written demand from CPIT’s solicitors. Given that CPIT’s solicitors have issued a written demand on 18 July 2017, the sum would be payable on 1 August 2017.
In those circumstances, Qilin now seeks a stay of the enforcement of the Judgment, in particular in relation to the solicitors’ undertaking and the sums which are held there, pending the Appeal.
The grounds on which Qilin seeks to stay the enforcement of the Judgment are set out in the affidavit of Wilbur VI Morgan James (“Mr Wilbur”) dated 21 July 2017. Mr Wilbur is a US citizen who gave evidence before me during the course of the trial. In addition, I have seen written submissions which were submitted shortly before this hearing which outlined the legal position on a stay of execution in Singapore and also set out what Qilin says are the merits of the appeal.
I therefore take those matters into account when I consider whether it is appropriate in this case to grant a stay of execution.
The applicable legal principles The position in Singapore, similar to other common law jurisdiction, is set out succinctly by Yong Pung How CJ in
While the court has power to grant a stay, and this is entirely in the discretion of the court, the discretion must be exercised in accordance with well-established principles (
Lee Kuan Yew v Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin [1990] 1 SLR(R) 772). First, as a general proposition, the court does not deprive a successful litigant of the fruits of his litigation, and lock up funds to whichprima facie he is entitled, pending an appeal (The Annot Lyle (1886) 11 PD 114 at 116). However, when a party is exercising his undoubted right of appeal, the court ought to see that the appeal, if successful, is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Offshoreworks Global (L) Ltd v POSH Semco Pte Ltd
...Solutions, Inc v Asian Broadcasting Network (M) Sdn Bhd [2017] 4 SLR 1 and CPIT Investments Ltd v Qilin World Capital Ltd and another [2017] 5 SLR 148 (as well as Telemedia Pacific Group and another v Yuanta Asset Management International Limited and another [2017] 4 SLR 26), the SICC adopt......
-
Civil Procedure
...Bhd [2017] 2 SLR 814 at [54]–[56]. 115 [1999] 3 SLR(R) 842. 116 [2007] Bus LR 686. 117 [1977–1978] SLR(R) 112. 118 [2017] 4 SLR 26. 119 [2017] 5 SLR 148. 120 [2017] 4 SLR 14. 121 Cap 19, 2008 Rev Ed. 122 [2018] 3 SLR 117. 123 Antariksa Logistics Pte Ltd v Nurdian Cuaca [2018] 3 SLR 117 at [......