Chia Sze Chang v Public Prosecutor
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 08 October 2002 |
| Date | 08 October 2002 |
| Docket Number | Magistrate's Appeal No 175 of 2002 |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Khua Kian Keong and Another v Public Prosecutor
...(R) 435; [2000] 3 SLR 439 (folld) Bala Murugan a/l Krishnan v PP [2002] 2 SLR (R) 420; [2002] 4 SLR 289 (folld) Chia Sze Chang v PP [2002] 2 SLR (R) 1153; [2002] 4 SLR 523 (folld) Chua Keem Long v PP [1996] 1 SLR (R) 239; [1996] 1 SLR 510 (folld) Khoo Kwoon Hain v PP [1995] 2 SLR (R) 591; [......
-
Public Prosecutor v Lim Boon Keong
...Act, stated: 34 Clearly this is a discretionary and not a mandatory inference: Chua Keem Long v PP [1996] 1 SLR 510, Chia Sze Chang v PP [2002] 4 SLR 523 and Satli bin Masot … Strict criteria have been stipulated before this adverse inference can be drawn against the Prosecution, namely (a)......
-
Public Prosecutor v Ng Chee Tiong Tony
...James [2000] 3 SLR 293 at [49]; Mowvalappil Ussainer s/o K Alikunhi v PP [2001] SGHC 191 at [28]; Chia Sze Chang v Public Prosecutor [2002] 4 SLR 523 at [13] to [14]; Amir Hamzah Bin Berang Kuty v Public Prosecutor [2003] 1 SLR 617 at [46]. I saw no basis to do any different Failure to call......
-
Rajalakshmi Ramoo v Sulochana d/o T D Sakkrawarthi
...judgment, no adverse inference should be drawn in this case and I need only cite the following passage of Yong CJ in Chia Sze Chang v PP [2002] 4 SLR 523: No adverse inference could also be drawn against the prosecution under s 116 illustration (g) of the Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Ed). I h......
Get Started for Free