Chan Kin Choi v PP
| Date | 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
- Public Prosecutor v Mansor Md. Rashid
- Sathya Vello v Public Prosecutor
-
Chai Chien Wei Kelvin v Public Prosecutor
...was approved and applied by the House of Lords in R v Sharp [1981] 1 All ER 65 and by this court in Chan Kim Choi v PP [1991] SLR 34 [1991] 1 MLJ 260 . In the latter case, this court added the rider that in Singapore the deciders of fact in a criminal trial are judges and judicial officers ......
-
Abdul Rashid s/o Syed Ibrahim & Another v Public Prosecutor
...as it was self-serving and contradicted by the evidence of Ms Kanikka and statements of Mr Mohammad bin Ali: Chan Kim Choi v PP [1991] 1 MLJ 260. Mr Abdul Rashid clearly did not have any intention to pay for the sex. 199. Mr Mohammad bin Ali signed statements after due consideration - Secon......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
STATEMENTS UNDER SECTION 122 (6) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (CPC): SOME OBSERVATIONS
...appears initially to be unqualified, the explanation, being produced at a much later stage of questioning. 13 [1990] Crim. L. R. 341. 14 [1991] 1 MLJ 260. Also see an interesting article by Stanley Yeo, ‘The Admissibility and Effect of Exculpatory Statements in Criminal Cases’[1981] 2 MLJ 1......
-
CO-ACCUSED CONFESSIONS: THE THIRD ANNIVERSARY
...s 511 of the Penal Code entitles the attemptor to a 50% discount for imprisonment. 49 [1993] 2 SLR 9. 50 Supra, note 9. 51 Chan Kin Choi [1991] 1 MLJ 260. 52 This provision declares “any statement, whether it amount to a confession or not” to be “admissible at his trial in evidence”. The im......