Caj v Cai
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Andrew Phang Boon Leong JCA,Judith Prakash JCA,Steven Chong JCA |
| Judgment Date | 11 November 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Singapore) |
| Docket Number | Civil Appeals Nos 11 and 43 of 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
CFJ and another v CFL and another and other matters
...when exercising its supervisory jurisdiction over arbitral tribunals and their awards. As recently observed by the Court of Appeal in CAJ and another v CAI and another appeal [2022] 1 SLR 505 (“CAJ”) at [2]: “it is not common in Singapore for awards to be set aside, and the courts have only......
-
CJA v CIZ
...and the expiry date of the Amended Agreement were clearly canvassed before the Tribunal. The present case is thus different from, for example, CAJ and another v CAI and another appeal [2022] 1 SLR 505 (“CAJ”), where a defence that the appellants were entitled to an extension of time (“EOT D......
-
Kannan Ramesh JADCFJ v CFL
...UKPC 62 (refd) BQP v BQQ [2018] 4 SLR 1364 (folld) Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 (refd) BZW v BZV [2022] 1 SLR 1080 (folld) CAJ v CAI [2022] 1 SLR 505 (folld) CBX v CBZ [2022] 1 SLR 47 (refd) CDM v CDP [2021] 2 SLR 235 (folld) China Machine New Energy Corp v Jaguar Energy Guatemala LLC [2020]......
-
Btn v Btp
...SLR 390 (refd) BTN v BTP [2020] 5 SLR 1250, HC (refd) BTN v BTP [2021] 1 SLR 276, CA (refd) BZV v BZW [2022] 3 SLR 447 (distd) CAJ v CAI [2022] 1 SLR 505 (refd) CDM v CDP [2021] 2 SLR 235 (refd) China Machine New Energy Corp v Jaguar Energy Guatemala LLC [2020] 1 SLR 695 (refd) CKR v CKT [2......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Pleading Points In International Arbitration: Substance Over Form?
...of the 'five sources' are not featured in every arbitration and the list is instructive but not exclusive. Rather, as noted in CAJ v CAI [2021] SGCA 102 at [44], the broad approach is aimed "to avoid an inflexible and rigid analysis of the issues raised in the arbitration, so that issues wh......
1 books & journal articles
-
Arbitration
...38 [2021] SGHC 178. 39 CIZ v CJA [2021] SGHC 178 at [36]. 40 CIZ v CJA [2021] SGHC 178 at [59]. 41 CIZ v CJA [2021] SGHC 178 at [56]. 42 [2022] 1 SLR 505. 43 CAJ v CAI [2022] 1 SLR 505 at [10]. 44 CAJ v CAI [2022] 1 SLR 505 at [65]. 45 CAJ v CAI [2022] 1 SLR 505 at [26]. 46 CAJ v CAI [2022]......