Baker, Michael A v BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeQuentin Loh JAD,Carolyn Berger IJ,Dominique Hascher IJ
Judgment Date19 November 2021
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
Docket NumberSuit No 3 of 2018 (Summons No 37 of 2021)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Gate Gourmet Korea Co, Ltd and others v Asiana Airlines, Inc
    • Singapore
    • International Commercial Court (Singapore)
    • 1 December 2023
    ...to proceed: Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) v BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd [2022] 3 SLR 103 ("Baker') at [45(c)]. 56 As noted by the Court of Appeal in Sun Travels & Tours Pvt Ltd v Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd [2019] 1 S......
  • BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd and others v Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 21 September 2022
    ...in Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) v BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd and others [2022] 3 SLR 103 (the “Judgment”) at [6]–[42]. It suffices to briefly highlight the salient facts. For reasons which will be apparent below, the chronology of the......
  • BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd v Baker, Michael A
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 21 September 2022
    ...And Corrupt Organizations Act 18 USC (US) § 1962(b), § 1962(c) [Editorial note: The decision from which this appeal arose is reported at [2022] 3 SLR 103.] Thio Shen Yi SC, Ee Eng Yew Justin, Kevin ElbertandGoh Enchi Jeanne (TSMP Law Corporation) for the Woo Shu Yan, Tay Hong Zhi GeraldandL......
  • VEW v VEV
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 14 April 2022
    ...in Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) v BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd and others [2022] 3 SLR 103 (at [51]–[54]), where the SICC noted that Masri was a “paradigm example of a case involving consecutive proceedings”. The parties have also refer......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT