Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date04 December 2009
Date04 December 2009
Docket NumberCriminal Motions Nos 14 and 30 of 2009; Criminal Appeal No 6
CourtCourt of Appeal (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
24 cases
  • Mohammad Faizal bin Sabtu v PP
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • January 11, 2013
    ...See also Ong Beng Leong v Public Prosecutor [2005] 2 SLR(R) 247 at [5] and Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor and other applications [2010] 1 SLR 966 (“Bachoo Mohan Singh”) at [29], which present a slightly different organisation of the four conditions, but which do not differ in substa......
  • Mah Kiat Seng v PP
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • May 30, 2011
    ...public interest for its further consideration. The four requirements, as confirmed and applied in Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor [2010] 1 SLR 966 (“BMS”) at [29], are as (a) there must be a question of law; (b) the question of law must be one of public interest and not of mere perso......
  • Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • July 15, 2010
    ...Background facts The facts have been reprised in detail in my judgment in Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor and other applications [2010] 1 SLR 966 (“BMS (No 3)”) (at [5]–[14]), in which this court (by a majority) granted an extension of time for both BMS and the Prosecution to apply t......
  • Kim Gwang Seok v PP
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • September 6, 2012
    ...[1994] 2 SLR (R) 1017; [1994] 3 SLR 129 (refd) Ang Cheng Hai v PP [1995] 3 SLR (R) 151; [1995] 3 SLR 201 (refd) Bachoo Mohan Singh v PP [2010] 1 SLR 966 (refd) Kiew Ah Cheng David v PP [2007] 1 SLR (R) 1188; [2007] 1 SLR 1188 (refd) Lim Choon Chye v PP [1994] 2 SLR (R) 1024; [1994] 3 SLR 13......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • JUDICIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ETHICAL LAWYERING IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • December 1, 2013
    ...(1988) Pte Ltd[2011] SGHC 12. 103Sutanto Henny v Suriani Tani[2004] SGHC 7 at [19]–[20]. 104Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor[2010] 1 SLR 966 at [81]. 105[2005] 3 SLR 184. 106Tung Hui Mannequin Industries v Tenet Insurance Co Ltd[2005] 3 SLR 184 at [44]. See also Tan & Au LLP v Goh Teh......
  • Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • December 1, 2013
    ...some rare exceptions to this principle (see, for example, the comments of the Court of Appeal in Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor[2010] 1 SLR 966), an individual aggrieved against a conviction recorded against him (or the sentence imposed as a result of such conviction) generally poss......
  • Criminal Procedure, Evidence and Sentencing
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2015, December 2015
    • December 1, 2015
    ...distinct philosophies in sentence was a matter that the Court of Appeal alluded to as well in Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor[2010] 1 SLR 966 at [31]. Seen in that context, authoritative sentencing precedents, coupled with jurisprudential guidance from the High Court and Court of App......
  • Legal Profession
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2010, December 2010
    • December 1, 2010
    ...an extension of time) to raise a criminal reference on points of law of public interest (see Bachoo Mohan Singh v Public Prosecutor [2010] 1 SLR 966), his conviction was overturned by a majority of the Court of Appeal. 20.22 The facts were somewhat convoluted and it is necessary to repeat s......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT