Auf v Aug and Other Matters
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judgment Date | 26 November 2015 |
| Date | 26 November 2015 |
| Docket Number | Originating Summonses Nos 790 and 791 of 2014 and Originating Summons No 789 of 2014 (Summons No 4899 of 2014) |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Samsung C&T Corporation
...v National University of Singapore [2015] 5 SLR 438 at [40]–[42]) and arbitration (see TMM at [97]–[105] and AUF v AUG and other matters [2016] 1 SLR 859 (“AUF v AUG”) at [77]–[79]). In TMM, Chan J observed that the standards for giving reasons applicable to judges in court litigation ought......
-
JVL Agro Industries Ltd Agritrade International Pte Ltd
...the arbitration unless is expressly withdrawn, no matter how weakly the party may actually advance it. In AUF v AUG and other matters [2016] 1 SLR 859, a tribunal constituted under the Arbitration Act (Cap 10, 1985 Rev Ed) awarded damages to an owner against a contractor by reference to the......
-
BRQ and another v BRS and another and another matter
...of natural justice on this aspect of the challenge. It is true that a tribunal “should not come to decisions which surprise the parties”: AUF v AUG and other matters [2016] 1 SLR 859 (“AUF”) at [69]. But that general principle is qualified by another proposition – that a tribunal is not req......
-
Gokul Patnaik v Nine Rivers Capital Ltd
...precise nature and scope of the disputes in respect of which they seek the arbitrator’s adjudication. Finally, he refers to AUF v AUG [2016] 1 SLR 859, at [92] where it was stated: … the [a]rbitrator was confined to reaching a decision on the issues identified between the parties by the ple......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Arbitration
...[2016] 4 SLR 768 at [146]. 47 JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd [2016] 4 SLR 768 at [150]; see also AUF v AUG [2016] 1 SLR 859. 48 JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd [2016] 4 SLR 768 at [152]; see also Soh Beng Tee & Co Pte Ltd v Fairmount Deve......