Aqn v Aqo
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Judge | Choo Han Teck J |
| Judgment Date | 27 January 2015 |
| Neutral Citation | [2015] SGHC 19 |
| Citation | [2015] SGHC 19 |
| Hearing Date | 26 January 2015,03 November 2014,03 July 2014,30 April 2014,08 May 2014 |
| Year | 2015 |
| Published date | 28 January 2015 |
| Date | 27 January 2015 |
| Docket Number | Divorce Suit No 63 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeals from the State Courts Nos 48, 49 and 50 of 2014) |
| Subject Matter | Restraint of foreign proceedings,Access,Natural forum,Conflicts of laws,Family law,Care and control,Custody |
| Plaintiff Counsel | Edmund Jerome Kronenburg and Christina Teo (Braddell Brothers LLP) |
| Defendant Counsel | Khoo Boo Teck Randolph and Johnson Loo (Drew & Napier LLC) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Bouvier, Yves Charles Edgar v Accent Delight International Ltd
...the risk of dissipation. In this regard, we endorse the views of Choo Han Teck J in PTSariwiguna Binasentosa v Sindo Damai Shipping Ltd[2015] SGHC 195, where he made observations to a similar effect at [10] - [14]. That judgment was handed down shortly after we heard the oral arguments in t......
-
VEW v VEV
...former test may be subsumed within the latter (see [69] below). We endorse the test laid down in the High Court decision of AQN v AQO [2015] 2 SLR 523 (“AQN v AQO”) (which counsel for the respondent had cited to us). Indeed, in addition to the fact that the concept of unconscionability is a......
-
Vew v Vev
...to Agbaje v Agbaje [2010] 1 AC 628; [2010] UKSC 13 (refd) Aliye Ayten Ahmed v Mehmet Mustafa [2014] EWCA Civ 277 (refd) AQN v AQO [2015] 2 SLR 523 (refd) Baker, Michael A v BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd [2022] 3 SLR 103 (refd) Beckkett Pte Ltd v Deutsche Bank AG [2011] 1 SLR 524 ......
-
WYZ v WZA
...the Husband who chose to commence divorce proceedings in Malaysia nearly two months after the Singapore proceedings had been served on him. In AQN v AQO [2015] SGHC 19, Choo J noted at [11] in regard to the husband’s appeal against an anti-suit injunction restraining him from continuing wit......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Conflict of Laws
...party from continuing foreign proceedings. There are two cases relating to restraining foreign proceedings. 11.50 The first is AQN v AQO[2015] 2 SLR 523 which dealt with this in a family context. The parties entered into a prenuptial agreement, governed by New York law, which provided that ......