Afs v Afu

JurisdictionSingapore
JudgeAndrew Ang J
Judgment Date07 March 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] SGHC 52
Published date14 March 2011
Date07 March 2011
Year2011
Hearing Date25 November 2010,01 July 2010,03 September 2010,02 September 2010,07 July 2010
Plaintiff CounselFoo Siew Fong (Harry Elias Partnership)
Citation[2011] SGHC 52
Defendant CounselSuchitra Ragupathy (Rodyk & Davidson LLP)
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
Docket NumberDivorce Transfer No 626 of 2006 and Summons No 5789 of 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Wong Kien Keong v Khoo Hoon Eng
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 20 December 2013
    ...a division at the later date looking more unjust as it would be tilted in favour of the party guilty of bad faith: at [110] .] AFS v AFU [2011] 3 SLR 275 (refd) Anthony Patrick Nathan v Chan Siew Chin [2011] 4 SLR 1121 (refd) AOH v AOI [2011] SGHC 14 (refd) AOO v AON [2011] 4 SLR 1169 (refd......
  • Wong Kien Keong v Khoo Hoon Eng
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 21 June 2012
    ...facts and circumstances of the case itself: see TQ v TR at [73]-[75], [77], [80], [103]; AOO v AON [2011] 4 SLR 1169 at [19]; AFS v AFU [2011] 3 SLR 275 at [17]-[18]. As the court noted in TQ v TR (at [80], [86]), such an agreement may be given conclusive weight and effectively enforced in ......
  • Wong Kien Keong v Khoo Hoon Eng
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 20 December 2013
    ...that the court can take. A mixture of fact and the exercise of discretion may justify a different approach, as was the case in AFS v AFU [2011] 3 SLR 275. I will be discussing this case later in the judgment. As a related observation, where parties have failed to point towards any form of i......
  • WWS v WWT
    • Singapore
    • Family Court (Singapore)
    • 9 May 2024
    ...failure to make full and frank disclosure: UZM at [18] – [21] citing BPC v BPB and another appeal [2019] 1 SLR 608 (see also AFS v AFU [2011] 3 SLR 275 at [40] – [45]). The present case before me concerned a total of four applications taken out by both the Wife and the Husband for discovery......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Family Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...remaining S$9m in the proportion of 60:40, if it is just and equitable to do so. Marital agreements and consent orders 15.33 In AFS v AFU[2011] 3 SLR 275 (AFS), the parties entered into a deed of separation (Deed) in February 2003, three years before they divorced. Clause 11 of the Deed pro......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT