Abdul Latif Bin Mohamed Tahiar (trading as Canary Agencies) v Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin (trading as United Limousine)

JurisdictionSingapore
Judgment Date31 January 2003
Date31 January 2003
Docket NumberDistrict Court Appeal No 22 of
CourtHigh Court (Singapore)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 cases
  • Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACTAtek, Inc. and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 19 October 2017
    ...in Abdul Latif bin Mohamed Tahiar (trading as Canary Agencies) v Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin (trading as United Limousine) [2003] 2 SLR(R) 61 (“Abdul Latif”). On the basis of this authority, Tembusu urges me to disregard entirely any head of loss which AI has failed to plead.26 In......
  • Tuitiongenius Pte Ltd v Toh Yew Keat
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 19 October 2020
    ...in the affidavits (see Yap Son On ([53] supra) at [52]; citing Abdul Latif bin Mohammed Tahiar v Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin [2003] 2 SLR(R) 61 at [7]). In any case, Mr Keng’s assertion that he was ignorant of ThinkTank’s existence and, presumably on this basis, of ThinkTank’s aff......
  • Yap Son on v Ding Pei Zhen
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 19 December 2016
    ...(see Abdul Latif bin Mohammed Tahiar (trading as Canary Agencies) v Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin (trading as United Limousine) [2003] 2 SLR(R) 61 at [7]). The consequences of the inadequacies in the pleadings were predictable. As the Judge observed on more than one occasion, the pa......
  • Icon Studio Pte Ltd v Kingsley Khoo Hoi Leng
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 18 March 2020
    ...in Abdul Latif b Mohammed Tahiar (trading as Canary Agencies) v Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin (trading as United Limousine) [2003] 2 SLR (R) 61 at [7]: Having heard arguments from both counsel, I came to the conclusion that the arguments by the plaintiff’s counsel as respects the Me......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...Representative of Tan Hock Kee (deceased)[2003] 2 SLR 1; Abdul Latif bin Mohammed Tahiar v Saeed Husain s/o Hakim Gulam Mohiudin [2003] 2 SLR 61 (also referred to at paras 9.51 and 9.88 infra, with regard to ‘Discharge by performance and breach’ and ‘Restraint of trade’, respectively); Wee ......