ABC Company v XYZ Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Singapore |
| Judge | Judith Prakash J |
| Judgment Date | 08 May 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] SGHC 107 |
| Citation | [2003] SGHC 107 |
| Date | 08 May 2003 |
| Published date | 02 October 2003 |
| Plaintiff Counsel | VK Rajah, SC, with Allen Choong and Priya Selvam (Rajan & Tann) |
| Docket Number | Originating Motion No 600027 of (Summons in Chambers No 601646 of 2002) |
| Defendant Counsel | Alvin Yeo, SC, with Tay Peng Cheng (Wong Partnership) |
| Court | High Court (Singapore) |
| Year | 2003 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 cases
-
Re Kotjo Johanes Budisutrisno, ex parte International Factors Leasing Pte Ltd
...grounds after the prescribed period of four months had lapsed. 6 In support of his argument, counsel referred me to ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd [2003] 3 SLR 546. In that case, the applicant sought leave to amend the originating motion to set aside an arbitration award. Under Art 34 of the UNCITRAL ......
-
Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd v Habibullah Coastal Power Company (Pte) Ltd
...of the Act. My reasons for rejecting this contention are set out below. The statutory provisions As I explained in ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd [2003] 3 SLR(R) 546 at [3], art 34, Sch 1 of the Act deals with the recourse that a party to an arbitration has when he is not satisfied with an arbitral aw......
-
PT Pukuafu Indah v Newmont Indonesia Ltd
...leave could provide some measure of residual protection for the rights of both parties: at [21] and [27].] ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd [2003] 3 SLR (R) 546; [2003] 3 SLR 546 (folld) Mohamed Ibrahim and Koshi Mohamed, Re Arbitration Between [1963] MLJ 32 (refd) PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero) v......
- Kembang Serantau Sdn Bhd v Jeks Engineering Sdn Bhd
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Judicial Approach To Application And Construction Of Arbitration Act 2005 In Malaysia: Section 8
...and exclusion of a power to extend time, I have also taken note of the persuasive High Court of Singapore decision in ABC Co v. XYZ Ltd [2003] SGHC 107; [2003] 3 SLR(R) 546 . . . I do not see why the Malaysian approach to the same broad issue should be any different, particularly in light o......
3 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...Ltd v Citus Trading Pte Ltd[2003] 3 SLR 1; Kiyue Co Ltd v Aquagen International Pte Ltd[2003] 3 SLR 130; ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd[2003] 3 SLR 546; PT Tugu Pratama Indonesia v Magma Nusantara Ltd[2003] 4 SLR 257; Teck Guan Sdn Bhd v Beow Guan Enterprises Pte Ltd[2003] 4 SLR 276; Jurong Engineerin......
-
Arbitration
...2 SLR 131. 47 [2014] 1 SLR 372. 48 See paras 4.47–4.52 above. 49 See para 4.37 above. 50 The full text is cited at para 4.36 above. 51 [2003] 3 SLR(R) 546. 52 [2012] 4 SLR 1157. 53 ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd [2003] 3 SLR(R) 546 at [19]. 54 See para 4.32 above. 55 [2019] SGHC 260. 56 [2019] SGHC 18......
-
Arbitration
...a process is to be distinguished from an appeal where the merits of the arbitral decision are being examined. 3.42 In ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd[2003] 3 SLR 546, the applicant and the respondent were the claimant and respondent respectively in an international arbitration conducted according to th......